Re: [DNSOP] EDNS0 clientID is a wider-internet question

Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org> Tue, 25 July 2017 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bgreene@senki.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8108E131CE7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yJOjJL3iXRmT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp109.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp109.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13913131CD0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4B53C6A29; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
X-Auth-ID: bgreene@senki.org
Received: by smtp22.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: bgreene-AT-senki.org) with ESMTPSA id 5075868B3; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:44:51 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: bgreene@senki.org
Received: from [10.107.174.135] ([TEMPUNAVAIL]. [36.84.70.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:44:53 -0400
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
Message-Id: <38A2F929-CEA5-460C-929F-EB715993FC25@senki.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DFAC50CA-EB57-45F9-9AFB-9EE886707E32"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 21:44:42 +0700
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaar=tf6no0O5CxxKnCRzO6QXqnDAX4Hbvy5YatZzanMiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
References: <CAKr6gn1mZ7VTfM_wtpFX-G95wg-bWRA_YciZScFvr-YX8eYdWg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nutxneiZg1JR90O5vRXVs+0WHvRtHpwCRyn4bXpf6g4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZrsiGZUPJzT1bZG-K2mTt3wP=x05-_Qp=rRh8uaBjS4g@mail.gmail.com> <7E291C54-9C0E-418F-A9A4-AB2FFB1700E6@fugue.com> <CAL9jLaar=tf6no0O5CxxKnCRzO6QXqnDAX4Hbvy5YatZzanMiQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EVC8pHuFVV0z3rBxQpLacf21GT4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] EDNS0 clientID is a wider-internet question
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:45:00 -0000

> On Jul 25, 2017, at 8:53 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't believe the goal of the draft is to enable filtering.

The goal of the draft is to provide options. How those options are deployed is between the customer and the operator as defined by their contract.