Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E91129574 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pp3O5kNNObzd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2191D129588 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id y76so220018053qkb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=CnYaY0dUVxqzLe9j0cTlfDxDyw1S30UdajmYzDxWFSc=; b=lN3Xkak4QNDs3ZUglXwnQJs+8z+pwlvN/BKGU2oIwdCaAYARH0SNEYhixv1nbkRi4g T2MDDGJVXVDdCNW9CD95lHBcEek9MYqKvQkNVKJnDxHv6tAKZKorgE1xoSmkI15/BE7d bHBobsolcSNabURPO536T4N+lwQESMihiNktMGwyM9PlyQ2Bh+Em97JxT4U6VeVlMBo9 +kEHOlbRIqgmYugpIjDcO7K4+x2nYU0+EJPRL8yu8QNixk4fMCY5nLdmXIPQf2RJ/K0/ n6usooH+XatOxkkysQ/VbvC+zoYcfpHfnSFUxHuW+jEDnuHJ/AtRiwYbB2y/xA8JzzuQ o/5w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=CnYaY0dUVxqzLe9j0cTlfDxDyw1S30UdajmYzDxWFSc=; b=UflL9GHMYLfXm//5MNG8sG//LJVQ08HgjM8AVxHAduyH3Ow9rddclFtk5JSabXM487 6KCAuVI6GAJQ/0ncDqZNrvQQnepSHEa821JPDa1uC/4qGdGE6JnuS3Q2kf/HH3KvrzJp wIc5Eu4lGMSCpy4svSJAfiGJCg9xV4y0pBz1wXcfpTX4dkKx62FSMa9aYZvHqAqKO6Dp iLtNXpdhOgdjqaPsA9zC4DAiXulNDolPVwpnf9ZuygUki8qALCvA5yr94WF0YhYPTWq0 +90lfUUvgPp3yoLJ33CDxH3sy96S33pDZmy9pIajUGESn+hlZ1BeRHWxvcjv10QT3OlG pHqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2k0sFPvpv0jxWQ4pLYweoMb4e9YDxUIf1iw34CnxEGHpdn0L9GtoemKC+KHFRf6w==
X-Received: by 10.55.127.4 with SMTP id a4mr33197175qkd.215.1489405804322; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18f:801:600:907f:7393:27af:19ab? ([2601:18f:801:600:907f:7393:27af:19ab]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t43sm11977323qtc.64.2017.03.13.04.50.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Mar 2017 04:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <9BDD87FD-DBC3-4684-8F0F-5899BE0BB4D2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_151E8615-19B0-43CA-A7C8-A926CC4E071F"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:50:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4D5675CA-7DA1-4F76-9EAC-25C473EAFEDA@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <4D5675CA-7DA1-4F76-9EAC-25C473EAFEDA@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/EVazNU9OwC17UsFa0H7VR5XXYGI>
Cc: Warren Kumari <wkumari@google.com>, dnsop@ietf.org, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps and draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:50:09 -0000

> On Mar 12, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> 
> For what it is worth, reviewed these documents today
> as an interested individual, and both seem to be OK
> from my (very limited DNS expertise) perspective.
> 
> Thanks for your work on this important space.

And thank you for your review and comments.

> 
> I did have a few mostly editorial comments though.
> 
> In sutld-ps, Section 3:
> 
>      There are several different types of names in the root of the
>      Domain Namespace:
> 
> It would be beneficial to phrase this as a problem, as in what
> issues the fact that there are different types causes.

In the -03 rev of the doc (pre-publication version available here: https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps <https://github.com/Abhayakara/draft-tldr-sutld-ps>), we moved that text up to the Introduction as background information.  Section 3 then includes specific problems that result from the fact of the different types of names.

- Ralph

> 
> Also in the same section:
> 
>     The RFC 6761 process took more than ten years from
>     beginning to end
> 
> Was name allocation part really 10x more than the rest of
> the protocol development? I was not paying much
> attention to the topic at the time, but I thought there
> also other issues. Also in fairness, mentioning the
> .onion process might be a more representative
> sample. (But I’m not disputing the point of this
> problem, it is real. Just wondering if we can be more
> accurate about the description.)
> 
> Finally, on -alt: For the record, and realising the
> extensive discussion that the WG has had on
> these topics, but I was a bit surprised by the
> choices in -alt to not have a registry and to
> use “alt” (which I associate with some Usenet
> groups, showing my age). I’m quite fine with the
> WG’s recommendations, however.
> 
> Jari
> 
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop