IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] additional documents for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 13 April 2022 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F093A1BB3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:36:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6faTsjziFh9z for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F703A1BAE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id bu29so4919024lfb.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:36:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jZmhyMlz2WhSFb1/W7RQh6U4KzikqlsYqZOmNQJBgq8=; b=XkP5kwUlUbLMcvQBN7r67yNwM9wGGBMT31O9ixew1GmOMQS6SURklLThXP95Qq+who TBaq1+l6yIIeK7tL94oJ08FpzpeKrAOeArQXj7fyn7QqAWjkS3taZvoUeTD9Cm2CgqHm 3eMF1sax25zfQ0C+vGt5j7CTJKBO8xsGFKr2OBxqjVBQ5DgjMbKUpA4lKsi2Q3QarPLW eEjlxPW1DK1z2yDahkDO4ATw9zPcydBh5FLENFCLvdPeam4aMAcaOI4mn+pMBo1di0Ch Rw/TR7x9TZsNAyHK5a4a+HXyAT9PssovOXG410K64XqO6tLIVY8dr8MwTmPVJVFGnrZM UsPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jZmhyMlz2WhSFb1/W7RQh6U4KzikqlsYqZOmNQJBgq8=; b=lt4PF/eZR4ufACKhjo8Ulnra2YaX9vTsNFO/Cdx93+pAVJpsSFsMzfFvb3jjcfCHL+ Z0wKEExnqbW8YoRSMPi6D2ipUMZ7nt/byV+peMYavN2i073V/aAj+J1O2J6t8BRjtRPK dxOfJcYGc6nnB5rd8t61vaN5Rx70prU+pfm4OHmIt8S1F1RxCybTLnDjDisXJxRUYwq+ SQXP7619tnoJ40Si3VjxcdlaqO3njGx7D2EzwLCJwIYS3G+/xxtNDp6F0k72pIFny5Di Wh38B5H8PnK2WyH74WX8z9fIPbQHEaU7GLy/KTgk5PNVj98/PYXqfVYgOEPX1Mm/0Tfb 3QWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iNQkcn39c0TEqUpxuaL+/V4JIMCNBK24MdM5PKqC+NaX0JB+n em6mJle+pVQ6EenVm27G+D3jy81za7RQDgwpeeTVErXCysc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyNI81eqiA+LSC9x3ljS6DVzinggr0eM0ETCjryRPs0G0bhJrfWr2OmaefCTpS/IN+jkcJknv57rtNA1cBd14s=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1046:b0:46b:eb4f:e597 with SMTP id c6-20020a056512104600b0046beb4fe597mr3370382lfb.493.1649871397185; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:36:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 13:36:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EeM874PtfU+uBU4pe2HX5v-SGrGK6+Zx-o9kSc-sEiow@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008dee5005dc8c9e6e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ebp1gP7IkkwH6ZUu5IVus6MXvlI>
Subject: [DNSOP] additional documents for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bcp
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:36:45 -0000

All

During the call for adoption, a few folks mentioned other DNSSEC
documents (7129 comes to mind).  While I trust Mr. Hoffman's attention to
detail, I wanted to do a quick check to make sure nothing slipped by.

I pulled this list from rfc-editor.org of every RFC with DNSSEC as a
keyword or in the title.

https://gist.github.com/moonshiner/0746776f2351ae9c8e3edb3373ee39c6

The ones marked "No" were made by me. Feel free to say otherwise.

However, I left 8 RFCs undecided.  If the WG has any opinions on those,
please feel free to speak up.


thanks
tim

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email