IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On squatting and draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 06 January 2014 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B625D1AE019 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:01:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGMKyEDe6R9I for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E341ADE8B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 07:01:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4300480055; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:01:06 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1389020466; bh=2ptrUoGgaG5UoEyJz4T0U3F8sQMOfgbvYub4qm4GZuM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=rRfE+lNfmjOtofdntp1GgGXGnJqixxyZz/9CeRRb/IKtmSEKvoviMwWch9HREXnoc PZIvOiQ7ZgaElI5i4osy1cMcsrgVpNbhMD60DeurDJSMP6HNjpmMFj46ecwn1GM6dq 0lo80YwU7ow5OSHi6yhHHfEQeFjkOdNBzmd++Sz0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7A280048; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:01:06 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 10:01:06 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20140106084626.GB27479@nic.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1401061000250.18543@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <20131231000412.GV4291@mx1.yitter.info> <52C323CE.3090909@grothoff.org> <20131231234421.GA5732@mx1.yitter.info> <52C48A4A.6090303@in.tum.de> <4C051985-6E70-463A-9672-02657842754D@vpnc.org> <20140106084626.GB27479@nic.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On squatting and draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:01:21 -0000

On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> Come on, that's completely unrealistic. Can you imagine ICANN
> delegating .local to any one, after it has been used massively by
> Apple Bonjour, even before RFC 6761 sanctioned it? Can you imagine
> ICANN delegating .onion to someone, giving the number of collisions it
> would generate? ICANN did many stupid things but this one seems very
> unlikely.

I'll believe this when .mail won't get delegated......

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email