Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-12.txt
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 24 July 2018 19:10 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03BD130DE9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ko9nvbHZsW51 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A0E12E039 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.168] (76-218-8-128.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id w6OJCmfQ015706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:12:48 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1532459569; bh=fk16U+31FSAehtUjwTXvQ0G7LFp7s8J/D3KeXUClDSc=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:Reply-To:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=LfmJmiiX8LscMb58tN6zPgmRErWXiJrc0xCsSWWNXF7o4Nv56LGeorsmGiA+6Ge20 JYo/dw2erPVxaLQ4wtgocUMuLuLDkPuJYKKrcO3dQQL6F22XKuUXFJfVkst8g+9ZEJ XscFRA5WZN/j27CTpqrZlMEFNCBaaLGEbagg3VLg=
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <153218948962.28565.12509610526258164940@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8Aoe48qyRx2khonSR60kz3taz4tPa+a4mh=xnQXHjr5=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+ExNXWxkZXpR0vBcCS0vFJFk1-20nUfrm2eXN1kver3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <22e7ce96-e994-7667-a488-d43cdcb716da@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:10:02 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+ExNXWxkZXpR0vBcCS0vFJFk1-20nUfrm2eXN1kver3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Eklaqs-GeYvefN4xHslsP3p6Soo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-12.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 19:10:15 -0000
On 7/23/2018 2:22 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > ooks like a typo. That has been there for a bit. > ... > The table on page 6 includes: > > "._protoB._service2" Given that it's the only one like that, yes, it should be changed. Just to bikeshed the issue, note that it's not 'wrong' to have the dot there, given the nature of this registration activity and therefore the context that the examples are going to get used in. But certainly things need to be consistent and that one isn't. Thanks for catching it, Bob. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf-12.… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Mats Dufberg
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] missing entries from draft-ietf-dnsop… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] missing entries from draft-ietf-dnsop… Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Mats Dufberg
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf… Mats Dufberg