[DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragmentation .
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 21 November 2019 06:55 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF9A120143 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:55:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMBHVurQvWWm for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437D31200B5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id n4so2583951qte.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:55:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1hM7msMwCpmwUeRXbVRtJcJC3ZeelotzQgwPSCoN5aw=; b=ZOPneHl19yYOiNhxNoOfP0TjDjUUkeErAEVJTs/PX6BJofMDwIMc+jAaZsSRGjNJIQ VlwHObHsof76xCboh12Oykr3HuyXpV5PMowSOoLCOuu9bNoY9L577lYMZkhkgi/jVYRd px5HkHKQ0JKFi3ItyhkV4QofFwtAOX1uyMJ++csb94LxtXL77SHZV03wS0uCTbriqWNW t6mJ3Dh8sv2r0yBpOcz1fHMGyCl51l0YXabGVN76UjoaQe7xpGKKdRbxlKRuMP0yghTV is2D1XX85TIjXpS13Bi92X3M0A9f9qqXYW/BP9AmGtkEElmwcgsFmX4baptLgzRjoQzo GyVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1hM7msMwCpmwUeRXbVRtJcJC3ZeelotzQgwPSCoN5aw=; b=pcniOTkegn7wQIvAqJ/AW2q8ZocjXhrRXjjXjoV2wMs++fcjGGhrLDc2LtQPUYGHK1 Jei7fQM55qxIdXTDfk2L1MaTH4nv9I8Xgwh/e022OzxsBKp7dIQXITbk/HkVO406F5tr i6RiCt/odaKipHAl/eWO0RIFn/peI5sG9OQ9qi5ISyv48XS4HSavofj9UZDOxfPxf3bK /0pb6n+gr+r+dtq5fcPu8ON9zjlFFym6/lqidC0ur2z4uM8nta0Y4G2qVtr32ywIKnjd sDKokkuRLp4/j2LqDw5mBwi+DMaW24E+7k9kCLoyjbb8qakHgoSgQQb3ZYKL2jXqDJkC wAzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4XschRU1YXrxPhx2W1kHHp2DS7YUsS+7X9iKbLMCAKeG8VW2N q3pUE9Su/LQKq3rqGad5DT5m53YJj070YrBXAuEbLk2PbXA2fg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxlraU3zmLzeEFYwUCgGKAhJSEwIOvhJE5HvNhJxCAvgw+XkNKEhja2eIocGOcmEfNfpuVtvE0BFFI5dTlsdT8=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3246:: with SMTP id y6mr7052742qta.279.1574319324781; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 22:55:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:54:47 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLhqmfv9=2P2-Hybxd-ncctm8vk=eSo8S8jH+TDG6fhhg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Eq7Ullp7AFyelu6BTUEJ9jNAU1o>
Subject: [DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragmentation .
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 06:55:28 -0000
Hi all,
The draft on fragmentation which was being mentioned in the Thursday
sessions was:
IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile-17
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-frag-fragile/
This is currently with the RFC Editor.
W
--
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
---maf
- [DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragmentat… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragme… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragme… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] Draft mentioned in meeting re: fragme… Warren Kumari