Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies?
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 30 March 2015 03:24 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216231A8AEE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id APB--1zUELXn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 053BA1A8AEB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055611FCAB9; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:24:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272EF16004E; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:31:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-175-41.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.175.41]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF86816004A; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:31:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1919B2C1A008; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:24:24 +1100 (EST)
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <683E2720-66F7-4B45-8787-99BD93FA2496@vpnc.org> <CAF4+nEHMPGtdR42qVBRuDuTuOR=Xu-xDRwvOM0L2UXLNVcDvdQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150330030443.GA23274@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:04:43 -0000." <20150330030443.GA23274@isc.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:24:24 +1100
Message-Id: <20150330032424.1919B2C1A008@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/F2WHBZeredUNJL_Yj7-z2SLlS00>
Cc: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-ietf-dnsop-cookies?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:24:38 -0000
In message <20150330030443.GA23274@isc.org>, Evan Hunt writes: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:38:24PM -0400, Donald Eastlake wrote: > > The big argument against a Cookie error field, that I can see, is that > > it isn't there in the BIND implementation and running code speaks > > loudly in the IETF. > > When this is standardized, BIND will be changing the OPT code anyway; > modifying the option format wouldn't be a huge problem. (I suspect it'll > be more of an annoyance to change the name from "SIT" to "COOKIE".) > > Would it be reasonable to leave space in the option for error reporting, > but leave it up to the implementor to decide whether to bother doing so? Whether you generate the error code or not is immaterial. If it is there then the client has to code for it. > -- > Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org > Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-ietf-… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-i… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-i… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-i… Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] Summary of the two options in draft-i… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-eastlake-fnv Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-eastlake-fnv Donald Eastlake