IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 10 May 2021 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F88A3A2929 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4nZUPbcl1Ch for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D913A292B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 12:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FfBgQ5zL4z9yn; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:58:10 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1620676690; bh=eghs0AyOpr443ntGM6/GuwsWIwhvL2MA1GOX9xanc0Q=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=mUPT0km6UTOBtsyK/vnQocQadmFeh6WknvIvWsERUSZM2BpNlcTWBZEo/UmifITC5 tIot7NybkGhLwLAbGo8Fd3cUpMoGO19BgDtpMqA2h6TAwbQCcjZWFo3VV4rJ9/G8J8 BP6m/oTrZyo4JQe7D+WbeCtAq4VqVoMR8XL7pD3Y=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8aBZP6CjkY2O; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 10 May 2021 21:58:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D80C57349; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A93657348; Mon, 10 May 2021 15:58:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:58:08 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
cc: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6CC689F8-D3F7-4AD4-AC90-3D9B12D4E7B4@ogud.com>
Message-ID: <1562b17a-6789-ee46-d0f8-9a4114c5959@nohats.ca>
References: <bfaa3ab3-3d96-dcec-a175-5803de03d852@NLnetLabs.nl> <814773aa-9d50-1f93-b67-bcad96d96b1b@dotat.at> <6CC689F8-D3F7-4AD4-AC90-3D9B12D4E7B4@ogud.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/F5220bgAKDX6_zV9ERoWcN4uZzo>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 19:58:21 -0000

On Mon, 10 May 2021, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:

> I guess I support the document but would like it to say 
> “Please do not use NSEC3 but if you have to use NSEC3 use it use these settings”
>
> The document should point how trivial it is to expose most names in NSEC3 signed zone using Graphics cards and dictionaries.

But it should also then say something about opt-out, which might be
harder to agree on (imho: "really, we have the RAM/CPU/SSD/DISK now, you
should not use opt-out")

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email