Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12; was Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Tue, 10 July 2018 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074B7131091; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qp0Dt6g7bKfI; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF773131047; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [204.148.24.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9959122140; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <153092238624.5315.17258755138091784954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f233b9ed-a356-5124-e052-ce4833e25e43@nthpermutation.com> <468b0483-4e16-3042-a8e2-c6348126842b@nthpermutation.com> <CADyWQ+HKq1NoqMFDmGOuHK-9hDK=r28aUOsM=T=Lb=OvUCpVUA@mail.gmail.com> <6121b7c4-247b-7fca-ac03-c6c2196d12dd@nthpermutation.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:31:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <6121b7c4-247b-7fca-ac03-c6c2196d12dd@nthpermutation.com> (Michael StJohns's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2018 11:35:46 -0400")
Message-ID: <ybl8t6jymao.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/F8f-OA-GDDT2VhyXyq8n-GCFgDc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12; was Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-12
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:32:10 -0000

Michael StJohns <msj@nthpermutation.com> writes:

> I strongly object to the publication of this document as a Standards Track
> document.

I'll catch up on the rest of the thread later tonight (I've been gone),
but I agree with MSJ here: it should be informational; it's not a
protocol.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI