Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter

Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 26 March 2018 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066D91277BB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFet-oi-Gr5D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22e.google.com (mail-vk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D55128959 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id v134so1881997vkd.10 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EjjV0UmhZqEQbskcZUl9YuzrxdqkTZY21vEuTMh3XHY=; b=DZR6k+VNJgatpJQi6Sc+ZSe7rIK76EERtAlwuYUc7yhL34smpo+t0o+pozo2GuEQjD n8Fe5YYQUk36uheIwwTiwv3uU9uYGc4eH0XdsXeDTd0eqFwiT4pgJbpHBnNt4yxRjVXE zjgOdsCjtzDhfXblU07httVrQghHOnhhqczNXR0a4bEbZPmc1X3vtYtH8MLD8cirzajU 4Du9mzZeNvbfTBg/bEhVnnl2Bvc8Q9lWlUTbUoonTDDIzTMt6dY343/rUKiCz/X45kJY 0XEjwx648VgVM5MGc8HRU1lWSf9A4maXuYErRI//3tGOdUE92paCqqQczNF7kGAfKvDA XX+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EjjV0UmhZqEQbskcZUl9YuzrxdqkTZY21vEuTMh3XHY=; b=Q1Sl2gnhoUFwnH1QGfpjQjZk4f9AyoOQ9/OS4Kp8W/gEb5ZsJ5cSOZugmFivhyV/7u 6T0HpUTgUIFVl20TQdwqbS+M0XHEfGa37VT6juNuvTRPM6a0NIHljeIW5+ZE/VPh6SpA INvOHI8YRfJhraeIMt8SE4gsN8X8b0//MFvn4Psp2H6XiySseZhVzP0HWl16X3RWqaX3 CqlBeTrMz0FSR7HIp91oc2Gc/CMIfsnxH306jBgQhhdI3D34/5+AV7Qh/0EiiWQIUtbj 89TmXh1GWPneK0npFjDL1ctlM7DLG3mgcW2L7uGsELeowzDTZzrEEj13FaVEHs6HU+Xc FgRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FNggxxen7JPO17EHdfL0b7cndi/ZsGbxEMvKedh7xXw6BYyWnx sehjcv6irV2N0lGaS2yLd6l8IL1P8dxuEQM0eSA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+7nJVp5uxt2+IjMUlji/NfRUQS1+RCwzNhAFF06K2X8/5O3Kqvj5REYzDq5QndeYkjHzOfx7gmgfMXWkuzKUw=
X-Received: by 10.31.69.85 with SMTP id s82mr6997046vka.162.1522107507635; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.57.111 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:38:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA3D81B6-164F-4607-A7E6-B999B90C4DA8@gmail.com>
References: <20180326154645.GB24771@server.ds9a.nl> <CA3D81B6-164F-4607-A7E6-B999B90C4DA8@gmail.com>
From: Artyom Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 02:38:07 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+ZLRD9eyN7w4hc8BNQjJf4-x_RKNshB5Tp11HzR25Sm7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FFTEVD8qvrRmawDrDRUzHmkcVFk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Current DNS standards, drafts & charter
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 23:38:39 -0000

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> wrote:
> The current DNSOP charter was deliberately written
> to be flexible in what we could work on. Normally an
> IETF WG is chartered to perform a fairly tightly
> constrained piece of work and then either re-charter
> to an equally specific next work item, or shut down.
> But part of the purpose of keeping DNSOP around
> in a slightly more open-ended fashion was that the
> community seemed to believe that major protocol
> work on DNS was done, but there would still be
> pressure to provide for small tweaks on the wire
> and review Informational documents on
> operational practice such as DNSSEC maintenance.

As Martin Hoffman has pointed out before, this looks very close to
what SIP has faced before. They finally came up with a dispatch WG
[RFC7957], and recently, Security Area also went in that direction. Is
it something dnsop WG might also consider as a viable solution to the
protocol complexity issue?

| Artyom Gavrichenkov
| gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191
| mailto: ximaera@gmail.com
| fb: ximaera
| telegram: xima_era
| skype: xima_era
| tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58