Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoptions: draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 15 July 2019 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78279120100 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7oujDPNA6W7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EDF12002E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ncKC2rdWzKpr; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:35:59 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1563226559; bh=n9ZK2PoAj3oVydDSPE3DpwkSR8Ye1pw3FAi52D45/Yw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=XoD99BQmkGK6sR4ONb/pLjxRlvQnk/Gi5cN7pqfajnjSbXBwJYaTojej1r8G4LKbL FRkQ4K1OYMxz/BHgrtMo6k97k/5WlAdKmuVSAiPmpOf1EpoGc9bMyYosNwCeO50Kwk IRvnhRZ1KExphxxdqDYi3PKG4AHHF3Iy0SR+glmw=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XmRFTexCjUcv; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:35:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D99242FCD9; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca D99242FCD9
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEB3401A555; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:35:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:35:55 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
cc: DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <820fe3a1-9d54-15c1-8194-8a607bdf6a31@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1907151726520.15898@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <820fe3a1-9d54-15c1-8194-8a607bdf6a31@NLnetLabs.nl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FJ8B5JBp1rnLbEgjIweXMwcVj0s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoptions: draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 21:36:02 -0000

See also: https://marc.info/?l=ietf&m=154416657729620&w=2

An example of using IANA registries:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-05

eg:

            typedef encryption-algorithm-type {
                type uint32;
                description
                    "The encryption algorithm is specified with a 32-bit
                    number extracted from IANA Registry. The acceptable
                    values MUST follow the requirement levels for
                    encryption algorithms for ESP and IKEv2.";
                reference
                     "IANA Registry- Transform Type 1 - Encryption
                     Algorithm Transform IDs. RFC 8221 - Cryptographic
                     Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
                     Guidance for Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)
                     and Authentication Header (AH) and RFC 8247 -
                     Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage
                     Guidance for the Internet Key Exchange Protocol
                     Version 2 (IKEv2).";
            }


This prevents an incomplete enumeration and prevents obsolete/deprecated
items to be specified in yang RFCs. Since we have quite a number of dead
RRtypes, it is really important to not to create new RFCs that enumerate
things like MD, MF, A6, etc etc

Paul