IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5334F130DFF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:17:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id evwaXwVTj2-5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x135.google.com (mail-it1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDC81277C8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 02:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x135.google.com with SMTP id j79-v6so4939854itb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 02:17:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dC/t5qOvnDx2jnU3wiQzwzyUOeEV6hic/WrsPf8QSZw=; b=LdBHi8UchcnRmeN+h6dSwAbL7EhWjaaFYlwhxAaZCaypfVSVTIcwAaDxm4Gtc4rQ2Z FkPLAvm4Fe5vcaDKMosVn2QFYAT7D5RHnRHvyTsROCsKjP/hOhZePBlHpZr3AIV/+I7V RHKbazQH+Pj+xn8GY6sCdxrhc8enlOMOK50ECgEw1hs09YCSOEqwR2p41cITViNFtKNL EwlSDXQS1H52ARDeth7gKoG1jEPyYqLAPNQplUTUwbRrwX5uT4Pys57FcospsxcmSovd Az7S1XVjtqrYvo3dvhWcExeauGPplZPZdBnkxIwvJPRX0IRqkYTebP6jIGXtGqsmKbtx OocA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dC/t5qOvnDx2jnU3wiQzwzyUOeEV6hic/WrsPf8QSZw=; b=uWluN0vHgMdBNH7P1BDBck2U8+LBArMseYY+1rJS27QyJaol781Zak4g2HhLhZJi37 tSI8+lqCEaID0t8/2EH2bTPiBn8GpRP5wiKW8K64AP0NXMoii/AbZkaB/VaalXWInH1p e5zfrKPgfLbAolWcvzVsEAmvTcJMBFukpvGkuQMlwKRcblFWywHeRcmSsmjcaMPSfcv8 kFB2yvfeFFXdvf95CnYtOxbmfpVTNDg+QlNDH6I5LRM+hHybOWKbG64Eyp3N2VzQF8Cz OA8fi7cqutX5f9vm4Aj8dHO64Lgm4Szeqda5N1aoJOupIovqW1NPsb8RwgjG8sHiqy4n Dukg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJq/tVvuPVAOMENEai5KjnU5LWR7dkzIaqzKt1TjxIz3pRyEZ+I rCmKD3YYCyoBIoKSX+YnwHRG4ijiE5r+4Iu1mBG24A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5er6np9a1u2E1UdjWP9CJqOt06LvgnlG+lYCj9fE9rJrYHrz2i8fLqpOiOkTn4c7ItoeGhQajztX0S1NngaWe4=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:85c9:: with SMTP id d67-v6mr25110056jai.137.1541499467066; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 02:17:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180919201401.8E0C220051382A@ary.qy> <08C8A740-D09B-4577-AF2A-79225EDB526B@dotat.at> <20180920061343.GA754@jurassic> <E944887D-51ED-41A0-AC5A-3076743620D8@isoc.org> <acef1f69-8e4f-52cc-dca5-3ada9446e0ee@bellis.me.uk> <683ea769-094a-4f06-5a43-d5cb557f285a@pletterpet.nl> <75d28a7a-826c-6ae4-8df0-7813035d04a0@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <75d28a7a-826c-6ae4-8df0-7813035d04a0@bellis.me.uk>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:17:51 +0700
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GeLgi7YxKs-cDOSjHih4QKLAbiZV-XWFfH=EXetjWN0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027f3050579fc50cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FJEESbQzF7Fvf-PuaDYkBfTbmu8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:17:50 -0000

In doing some digging through my data, I have instances which I have an
apex of a zone, sub zone, etc that are not HTTP but actually a dynamic
database endpoint.

I also have solid number of instances where the apex is used mainly as an
API endpoint, that serves not HTTP web content.

just data points to fit into our world view.

Tim


On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:20 PM Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 06/11/2018 16:15, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
> > As nice and clean the HTTP record draft is, without specifying how to do
> > expansion of the record into address records it is not going to solve
> > the CNAME-at-the-apex problem that DNS providers have, and we will stick
> > with the proprietary solutions (this may solve a different use case
> > though).
>
> They're supposed to be expanded either in the client, or in the
> recursive resolver, as described in the draft.
>
> If we're misunderstanding each other, please let me know!
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status