Re: [DNSOP] FYI: draft-andrews-dnsop-defeat-frag-attack

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Wed, 10 July 2019 20:46 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6D91203E8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OvIgLa_WSpr6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA21F120438 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id p17so3474621ljg.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WzQrYdh+1ef83s2Dz4IFQJrcvykybfWi235ii0/M2So=; b=rULG0ulKv2w77D53QBENchaVAgMRDDhRDQL32aV4tnSjzuF2Zdlxe5gkt5WkeABIvq AdrxaqpJpqae9PIkzFbig/enK7L1uVGTvILmzxN+ivEwchvyBtmlrUkn68eZs8NdKPxk V4qvHWbW+BLMCgvHsQt3zcwuK8NFMTl6phkzXLa89iGY92bB4k/6VUGmEBpCSuMiFBgN j5OvS47X1L/7jH/BCou08jzrfcCrLbiKPPhcfWEjeHoKdStM7/6IzmE13hzfaUvc3u1h TKSlcoJbZ4AZCOLXJCK9/EnjUsP6YT5ww/b+/xUWvNPrRJXxAup6VW7G/87VgoRiQmXn zOww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WzQrYdh+1ef83s2Dz4IFQJrcvykybfWi235ii0/M2So=; b=QEVa4uRIa4ZZOsdDKifQ5W2R5Ry1bpIOOEYSX7IcQPwvWrSxXI4m50YnOC1aRWm/+r 1xZr8L8qKNnONVgX9tXnqdhr1Pbw2iQjmAyZCFnqpGzWl1cOoVCnttBRg88ch9oVv8RK F6LcTD2jdn2KqcFzarTHcPUa6FqxNnvCexGNj9+l9kvwjthpZ4cNqNA5fxTGoZVhjnpj U27BKMEwbt9TAD5+RyBgkBBzFkYcu8nqsgg4fnTt5ciRc1l0HL+arxOvPR5r9loLOxdH UJr1687wirCt1upFa7snS/EPthY3pxug32ZQIadZOigdYMOwVNXwOyDb2dM5Iwhjtxhe iAgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVtVMmW89d6r3tfQZxVQGp5R6oSXJq+YeV2yVL1eawimtacTLRF CXGOqP2ayx4YW7EWwq4CZSUWiGjB9G0bC5kk7D29Gg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxv7LIll/MP6rw9zKPbtnPrJD6gnL5r2jkm+RLPyzVq6wGYXxfGZ95QxziVObvv0hDBb6giHN/bD93KLnDkpXc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5548:: with SMTP id j69mr128053ljb.48.1562791564058; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <01BAC484-5E62-4573-A162-F3BD4F0DCF34@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <01BAC484-5E62-4573-A162-F3BD4F0DCF34@isc.org>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:45:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8DDe+uckresgeX-riVrK0SKAdF66XAi=4dau3ife7XSQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008b313058d59c4f2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FRZU3pXBCSkCseHrKI2BlDzDKkE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] FYI: draft-andrews-dnsop-defeat-frag-attack
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 20:46:23 -0000

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:21 AM Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:

> I’ve written up a method to defeat UDP fragmentation attacks using TSIG.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-andrews-dnsop-defeat-frag-attack-00
>
> If we are going to discuss methods to defeat such attacks this should be
> considered.
>
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
>

 Looks like a useful workaround.

2. The Well Known Key

The well known key has a owner name of "." and uses HMAC-SHA256
[RFC4635] as its algorithm with a key of 256 zero bits.


-- but later:

A.1. BIND 9

Add the following to named.conf. Some end-of-life versions do not
support HMAC-SHA256.

key "." {
algorithm hmac-sha256;
secret "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA=";
};


-- Does a key of 256 zeros translate to a string of "A" characters?  I am
not an expert on HMAC-SHA256.

-- 
Bob Harold