Re: [DNSOP] In a vacuum, nobody can hear you scream, was On the call for adoption on Special Use Names

avri doria <avri@acm.org> Thu, 06 October 2016 09:22 UTC

Return-Path: <avri@acm.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48816129917 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oU8e_LS0Cvxe for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0128.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B88C0129909 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF612691A0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 6176726940646F7269612E6F7267
X-Spam-Summary: 50, 0, 0, , d41d8cd98f00b204, avri@acm.org, :, RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:854:967:973:988:989:1042:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1381:1437:1513:1515:1516:1518:1521:1534:1541:1593:1594:1683:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2553:2560:2563:2682:2685:2691:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4250:4470:5007:6691:7652:7903:8985:9025:10004:10128:10400:10471:10848:11232:11658:11914:12043:12740:13069:13255:13311:13357:13868:14096:14097:14181:14721:14764:14777:21080:21212:21324:21366:21433:21434:30022:30029:30030:30041:30054, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:fp, MSBL:0, DNSBL:none, Custom_rules:0:0:0, LFtime:4, LUA_SUMMARY:none
X-HE-Tag: cave97_6d4988cd95f55
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2354
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [108.62.247.83]) (Authenticated sender: avri@doria.org) by omf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 09:22:30 +0000 (UTC)
References: <20161004031354.11827.qmail@ary.lan> <etPan.57f357f3.551beac5.8936@virtualized.org>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: avri doria <avri@acm.org>
Message-ID: <c290f7db-e6e2-3745-1adb-e6f122bd4f40@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 11:22:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <etPan.57f357f3.551beac5.8936@virtualized.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 161005-2, 10/05/2016), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FbK9UMAmPZNuJV-UIsVkzO0PWyw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] In a vacuum, nobody can hear you scream, was On the call for adoption on Special Use Names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: avri@acm.org
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:22:34 -0000


On 04-Oct-16 09:19, David Conrad wrote:
> As far as I know, neither ICANN (the organization) nor anyone within
> ICANN (the organization) is asking whether they should delegate such
> names. Forward motion of those names is currently "indefinitely
> deferred" pending _somebody_ (not ICANN staff) figuring out what to do
> with them. I believe the hope had been that the IETF might provide
> some technical guidance, but that didn't work. Now, some members of
> the ICANN community are asking the board that those names be delegated
> and that results in (re)opening the question of what to do with
> "indefinitely deferred" strings.

Actually I thought they were asking that work that had been promised on
further researching the problem and mitigation techniques be done as
opposed to just prohibiting things because the first thoughts turned out
to be inadequate.

As for the so-called toxic waste names (i really find that terminology
problematic) someone needs to find a solution otherwise the possibility
of adding more and more names to the so called waste pile of usurped
names over time becomes an increasing possibility.  If someone can just
start using a name and thus make it too hard to delegate we have a much
bigger problem.

avri

avri


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus