Re: [DNSOP] [homenet] ip6.arpa reverse delegation

[Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>]

Markus Stenberg <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > On 23.11.2014, at 23.14, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>
    > wrote:
    >> I have read: Automated Delegation of IP6.ARPA reverse zones with
    >> Prefix Delegation draft-andrews-dnsop-pd-reverse-02
    >> 
    >> as a method to delegate reverse zones to CPE devices as the prefix is
    >> delegated.  I find the method entirely sensible, and I think highly
    >> secure.  I don't know if this belongs in dnsop or in homenet (or
    >> dhcpv6, since a new DHCPv6 option is requested, and this enhances
    >> DHCPv6-PD): I'll let the INT and Ops ADs sort that out.

    > Is this actually desired by the operators? At least here (.fi), ISPs

I don't care what they want: I want it as a customer.
At this point, one can not originate email from IPv6 addresses without
working reverse names.

I don't care if some operators do not want to deploy, and I don't care if
some customers can't be bothered to setup or or own their reverse map.

Nobody is forcing anyone to do this; (or to run IPv6).
But, if someone wants to delegate the reverse (and I know many operators who
do), this seems like the right way to do it.

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     [e-mail]  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [