Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature
Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 00:31 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AC012955F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cc2IgpG0ivDZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8652412956E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:ec65:c0c4:f477:b801] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:ec65:c0c4:f477:b801]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E45861F9C; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:31:45 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <58DB0070.8060603@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:31:44 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Windows/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
CC: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "<dnsop@ietf.org>" <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <20170328183156.2467.qmail@ary.lan> <CAF4+nEGWJLz-RinMPGkfp3gOfBxcagxhWgk0UMbXAELCnnE3Jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEGWJLz-RinMPGkfp3gOfBxcagxhWgk0UMbXAELCnnE3Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FfLmXEiXNUKLTDzhTgJAsoU1pUE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:31:52 -0000
generally, we have not worried about versioning or capability negotiation among axfr/ixfr partners. a zone administrator can simply choose primary and secondary servers on the basis of advertised capabilities, and remove any who can't conform. last time we had this discussion, it emerged that many secondary and primary name service providers had their own private protocol and either did not support ixfr/axfr at all, or did not support any of their competitive extensions (like apex cname) over ixfr/axfr. it's my view that BULK is better than $GENERATE and i would have proposed the former rather than the latter had i known then what i know now. i further believe that it need not be a negotiated capability between ixfr/axfr partners. vixie
- [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Donald Eastlake
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Tony Finch
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Evan Hunt
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] BULK RR as optional feature Woodworth, John R