IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Fri, 06 December 2013 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD321AE0ED for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:01:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hwnDH0tpWTKi for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:01:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org (alpha.virtualized.org [199.233.229.186]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76E61AE0FD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:01:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD080848F1; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha.virtualized.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (alpha.virtualized.org [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28362-09; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:01:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [10.0.1.6] (c-24-4-109-25.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.109.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: drc@virtualized.org) by alpha.virtualized.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E482B84438; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 16:01:28 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9BD7CD73-0F5C-4C5E-B7BE-C90A887AE6C0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <20131205151313.GF28898@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:01:25 -0800
Message-Id: <EBF2EFA0-5E62-4304-BB06-321788C0437A@virtualized.org>
References: <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org> <20131204094449.GA5492@nic.fr> <9650BF6D-727B-4EF3-B357-7E4E2FDDE0AF@virtualized.org> <2614C613-1399-429D-856B-5E2C18DCA7A6@kumari.net> <20131205083609.GA5215@nic.fr> <52A07388.8060105@teamaol.com> <6BD0AE0A-C789-4F78-BF02-E0DDB5EC1B73@kumari.net> <20131205151313.GF28898@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:01:35 -0000

Andrew,

On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> The difficulty is in the claim that these names are already "out
> there".  If that is in fact true -- that these are names that are
> being handed around and potentially will get into protocol slots --
> then as a matter of prudence we should put all the strings in the
> special-use registry, and treat them all as .invalid is.

What criteria do you propose the IESG should use?

Regards,
-drc

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email