[DNSOP] Requesting time slots at IETF95 in B.A.

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 February 2016 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D524F1B349B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eHffImV4g7Qy for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0981B34A2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l127so190170894iof.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:reply-to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qZeJZNUkPhF9RUJEjEfjgZRc+gWAv4OCV/VYMlbgnME=; b=pmXeEmZYiDAa1wpqZ4lMK7lH7WDbn9dFfCcEgK1eq1pqm8ZSbsgBCLVaBGKRb53qdp jyeCOQIRzKSj/w8qafqLsrtBspFwfhxSIWxg5F0FugjWxTqJiR08ZneiD01seGolDsq8 9zdIX1rEofPf+iSyabDw8X7dsVXrJdJ69oheWQT6ASZycT4SXYdcxwvf5h4QAodU79TI etdmrxX1CiULEfPmTzH6rKPRbstm7rSkx25elVU4yuG/38fjSg8HRevu/TAg6BNgi7aG kLwcIykX5Lf/MfkrHwnKewLKdVW3iT3VkdfWyI3fZdkkjg4eSKBIgJE0spTPs8uIt840 WOdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:reply-to:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qZeJZNUkPhF9RUJEjEfjgZRc+gWAv4OCV/VYMlbgnME=; b=Em69dCLlA3UyklXzpAw8WxhMLReRXZFBAuOkOjiX9TOz7lohObKnv2JBpyQBE+7wxU jrkvkStyUw0SeXT3k4KlKkfV4AzxoQJmVY+LVxjhGqFMRKWHC1Id6CTztNo4si5RSXT3 tvpSlWTtKbq+m0zp3L47ikg4cEYiWJBWVzMo6Ue7UBs3h24UyuBujuf88iDf9id8YAvX 9oPDn2dPiZxt55CKOCzBoVXkfN4Hdlgdz0Fngudp1U/1rElMzzX4+JGMmUSm/CBo4hVV AmxcdnYWMTtRKpo9vInfXaXOXtZle//vXuodQ82ODXyznmxPTshs4YMIa4QeaAw4lFUY khvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQpYUjd79PvaNCONsq6rOcikbhRaxX2bOkp0fwU3IZiT/VoTyA46OiLGFiTVeATUA==
X-Received: by 10.107.198.14 with SMTP id w14mr19931015iof.83.1456760867653; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from still.local (184-19-64-38.drr03.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.19.64.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o201sm10996151ioe.15.2016.02.29.07.47.46 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:47:46 -0800 (PST)
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f849ec0e-3e07-7005-6ece-f6ff67a9b7d1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/46.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FkOLHgMup4Vnx2oY_5UBpTZ5vxA>
Subject: [DNSOP] Requesting time slots at IETF95 in B.A.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:47:50 -0000

Hi

We're beginning our call for time slots at IETF95.  We were hoping to 
wait until the scheduling has been done, as we have asked for two time 
slots:  a 2 Hour slot for DNSOP work, and a 1 Hour slot for DNSOP work 
that is related to RFC6761.

In reaching out to the chairs, you should mention if the work is 
6761-related or not.  That doesn't mean we won't move things around.

Thanks from the chairs,

tim/suzanne