Re: [DNSOP] [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@conundrum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDAC13233D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGhU-08ynZy3 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x230.google.com (mail-ua0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 246EA132332 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x230.google.com with SMTP id q25so9119608uah.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=conundrum-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zQFeCMBQYCuQ9eQN+UgJg2nJwH7kkrwW0JDNlTe7HDw=; b=Vm6gRngc2tGUKSxiOYgmTqiAww8nO3Mf29tw1kLClFuWuk09Jo9Iwno1WACEHsZyxS CZSg3CVA9mWPEMDsbFBfyMRQtIiW4Oxaz1mhFuCPl9QPkICXE1mED/4ZuySWMYgolGYA FerFCyIY0gWhhdJ/ml6mZcIjWlWLdlvvr+lvTvUEMXMyq+D1tLvjTIqsIOLQNv9gVx9k oGl3USNyd+tQ6wEyYc/RFvNAmX2SMWZlo2RGLj233gxxZqrpfGvn+suKrqE4JkxVR/i7 3W2fhbK40EH8eViz0BTOQpRTBBQ2xArgpkhxyF1U1UkeTUdFwSH7/9KNhYBQ0DFZ2LfE gTCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zQFeCMBQYCuQ9eQN+UgJg2nJwH7kkrwW0JDNlTe7HDw=; b=VgM1Tq7AUpWMRrJKU0pHZUYiYcmA1YnhW59ne66Wy9c89WTXGlOT3QGXMmNktZS9b7 JlNrJX76JiTT7doiddwkMkFzAUAqhLT0k6hnhbC6UMEHrwoUqB+yaBdMGrw+zubdO8mn cIDCEW9bLL+Bh9YMPt9IavmtT/RaGsYgj7NJbpgFj4OX4ZeMqaiJMwzprPyLRGzT0Yj/ 5gPGjK3xJxQzylTpLuQGr46dZuXOrqjFBA0rymBpPPV51hTgPTQ4e8ipnW1D6/Cht21B OfTCFtCaf5Ki+A2TF6DsQpnKO6J519PH4rVZWPbO/GHU4AekDbyIRLpLtpbOM4yDVWC2 Ixkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112iDcW8m5BCbE/uC0XNk5hFrmhuh/3IT6VrRyUvfOBeyRP796qm titacv+qBItWcH4eIZyyyGT0vph/9gC85Rs=
X-Received: by 10.176.18.231 with SMTP id o39mr2075933uac.58.1501862559797; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 09:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.84.74 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 09:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94641677-d072-3462-1c72-ab203c553eef@dcrocker.net>
References: <CADyWQ+HiVOz1zrhNeEYnzy4hryrhFu+v5GNWqcXdOqQBeB9Cig@mail.gmail.com> <9fc7ff7d-9f5a-ce2b-9fb1-e9b1c9eb0108@nostrum.com> <94641677-d072-3462-1c72-ab203c553eef@dcrocker.net>
From: Matthew Pounsett <matt@conundrum.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:02:39 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAiTEH8JwU8qEfCy-XrTFpHV1sQpjtEVzwZfu9=xWQZh2hyDZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4030436146c6147490555efa0f0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Fl847P9hRKxivoSO2gBSMd7eE28>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 16:02:48 -0000

On 3 August 2017 at 18:36, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:

>
>
> Therefore I propose to:
>
>    1. Have this document define the simple, sole, authoritative mechanism
> for registering "top-level" (global scope) underscore names.
>
>    2. Create a separate document that specifies modifications to the SRV
> and URI documents, rationalizing the use of underscore names, through the
> mechanism defined in -attrleaf-.
>
> Do I understand correctly that the intent is to obsolete existing
underscore registries (whether they be actual IANA registries, or just code
points listed in a draft) and move their data to a new, central registry?
This seems sensible to me.