IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Wed, 13 September 2017 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652481323F7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:36:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0pjUrytRCaqn for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D1051320D9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (50-1-20-198.dsl.static.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.20.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A83824548; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Cc: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20170911013510.17202.qmail@ary.lan> <yblr2vcxzjn.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <alpine.DEB.2.11.1709121124250.2628@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 10:36:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1709121124250.2628@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> (Tony Finch's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:41:28 +0100")
Message-ID: <yblh8w6a4cd.fsf@wu.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/FnHPNMMeCZewZ6YEcoGmPwjXQq4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 17:36:05 -0000

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> writes:

> From my brief look at a small amount of traffic, localhost queries are
> basically all handled inside the stub, so it is de facto as you
> describe.

Just as an FYI data point:  On April 12th (a DITL day) B-root received
just shy of a million packets with ^localhost$ as the query name, which
amounted to .018% of the total traffic.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status