IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR?

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Wed, 07 October 2009 13:16 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498673A6A98 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:16:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.103, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uDUgtS3h4vI for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.135]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C66F3A6A93 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.51]:41839) by ppsw-5.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.155]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1MvWP5-00079w-H1 (Exim 4.70) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:03 +0100
Received: from fanf2 (helo=localhost) by hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local-esmtp id 1MvWP5-00042j-8T (Exim 4.67) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:03 +0100
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:18:03 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <15F42D3E-3581-47C1-BCD2-071E5A9BCCF5@rfc1035.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0910071415120.17870@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <B668D106-141E-48EB-8C2D-C4AC7C2EB4DD@dnss.ec> <15F42D3E-3581-47C1-BCD2-071E5A9BCCF5@rfc1035.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Roy Arends <roy@dnss.ec>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Signing the root == end of ITAR?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:16:26 -0000

On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Jim Reid wrote:
> On 7 Oct 2009, at 13:13, Roy Arends wrote:
>
> > Since a date was announced yesterday (July 1st) for a fully deployed signed
> > root, can we expect ITAR to Go Away on Januari 1st 2011 ?
>
> Will DLV go away then too?

I doubt it because it's likely to still be necessary for bridging trust
gaps below the root. For example it looks like nic.at aren't in any rush
to deploy DNSSEC.

http://www.nic.at/fileadmin/www.nic.at/documents/dnssec/nicat_and_DNSSEC.pdf

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status