IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 08 July 2021 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAF53A1FF3; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id svN90jg4pts9; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 543B03A1FDC; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A00D423526; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, DNSOP-Chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CAHw9_iKhvHwUfJMOp-YhJkimmnN0f3DLbh+JWYxhCiZ9CjEEQQ@mail.gmail.com> <8263fbf5-aa2a-1b91-bf17-9c53e0994afa@nohats.ca>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 14:44:44 -0700
In-Reply-To: <8263fbf5-aa2a-1b91-bf17-9c53e0994afa@nohats.ca> (Paul Wouters's message of "Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:54:19 -0400 (EDT)")
Message-ID: <ybl7di0wkdv.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/G41ql2PMmaOiXSey-1TFGktob9k>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Consensus check on underscore names and draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2021 21:44:57 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> writes:

> There is no distinct privacy realm here, and query minimalization
> SHOULD stop, and the entire QNAME should be requested.

I think this is the primary point and the proposal should go forward
with the stronger wording.

But...  you know some future-dnsop will decide to create some new
special _label that does a privacy separation.  Because we hack DNS
never-endingly.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email