Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl> Tue, 16 August 2022 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <hsalgado@nic.cl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4BEC15949B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nic.cl header.b=ZEXWM8eF; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nic.cl header.b=aexnPBwW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ub8f2kfqANci for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (mail.nic.cl [IPv6:2001:1398:1::6008]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5415CC1522AE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19477180FD814 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:19:55 -0400 (-04)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nic.cl; s=default; t=1660684795; bh=BNJwpQiOiT3xPPi17BvHYH4RFrjjdQRrCALqze2hi7I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZEXWM8eFNEsxZ7HOhcqhjb8oPz/vSavwgEMKoxTtjh+I7KZHfUCYq9E/sOcZf0TCT 1Nx2fbbKyFpyfG4Fm2cPH1UdeKVGeUhcaSLOY9jdg0O0o/1XhRbK1bInzhrp3v2whS MI45es8pUOr/OZDZnuKABuAxu7PjnEuVzZVniD+XOfS0Du4wKa+EfUGaijBrOBwTVs 0W14ufzOeAXfrZ6cJaOynROFL0Bld1qT7ljtWvrLEUnXS1dilc1bfI5jmVfT4YpHv+ QrArtDWKpscUhgKr6UdLhyl+BkFUx9GrmC3qCS4s2YyPzwWd1WHFqxESmrE8IG9mhI 6JRgXw3HqcmgQ==
Received: from pepino (unknown [IPv6:2800:150:126:65:4a3d:968a:4938:f63c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.nic.cl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D85EB195D5C59 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:19:54 -0400 (-04)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nic.cl; s=default; t=1660684794; bh=BNJwpQiOiT3xPPi17BvHYH4RFrjjdQRrCALqze2hi7I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=aexnPBwWiuRlSgVp0SI6nz4yskivxSIeY1mCwEwzt/xYWs1Ua/m5lJeqwSg06LOAS YLxF6WKID2+A+tl2q+TzFyMZZEhNt2x3hARRr11RX5d22q8rDg0DRtX3veJCzvNN3a 2DmxUsVRC+p48T0AVr3XA18wZkOTc6YgI6Kb50ccRQcdADjNz8r3DnymCP6RM8rizM UnU7FnStXbiSj55AVwTlRyh5NUjnZj8bn+dzxywWN2ZY16tAhak90JyN0DFnKgnpNC ceSdhrBKHpMUjShEXb+1G9HaTzyO207042g6pCJLss76XA6Q7/PDrSOWOGC0RYeyBr f8h5eewDGp7EQ==
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 17:19:53 -0400
From: Hugo Salgado <hsalgado@nic.cl>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <YvwJ+RT8kpSxcrXH@pepino>
References: <164668869128.9050.17922186658317778247@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LmKfo6Ep8LQOtHTA"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <164668869128.9050.17922186658317778247@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on Tue Aug 16 17:19:55 2022 -0400 (-04) (mail.nic.cl)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GV6Ob3Y-iZoi5OamgCVacgeMxLI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 21:20:08 -0000
Dear authors. In the second paragraph of section 3 "Upgrading NS RRset Credibility" there is a mention of "Positive responses...", which I am not sure of its exact meaning. Do you mean ANSWERS>0? Or AA=1? I'm thinking of a (broken) nameserver that responds to NSs queries with NXDOMAIN (but does answer to other types)[1]. Is that a positive response, which should be cached with an authoritative data ranking? Thanks, Hugo [1]: https://github.com/dns-violations/dns-violations/blob/master/2018/DVE-2018-0004.md On 13:31 07/03, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF. > > Title : Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers > Authors : Shumon Huque > Paul Vixie > Ralph Dolmans > Filename : draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.txt > Pages : 7 > Date : 2022-03-07 > > Abstract: > This document recommends improved DNS [RFC1034] [RFC1035] resolver > behavior with respect to the processing of Name Server (NS) resource > record sets (RRset) during iterative resolution. When following a > referral response from an authoritative server to a child zone, DNS > resolvers should explicitly query the authoritative NS RRset at the > apex of the child zone and cache this in preference to the NS RRset > on the parent side of the zone cut. Resolvers should also > periodically revalidate the child delegation by re-quering the parent > zone at the expiration of the TTL of the parent side NS RRset. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-02 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >
- [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidat… internet-drafts
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Hugo Salgado
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-reval… Hugo Salgado