IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 12:08 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064821A92B6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5YZ8X-pUvGZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20BD1A92B4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49149DA007A; Tue, 12 May 2015 12:08:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.1.40] (205.178.35.126) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 12 May 2015 05:08:56 -0700
References: <20150508193400.55273.qmail@ary.lan> <FF464258-0C33-45CC-A684-BAB7BCE8A8FB@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505082118060.31363@ary.lan> <0902600F-134B-4688-9CDD-1ACB23431DDE@vpnc.org> <20150512010624.GC74841@mx2.yitter.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <20150512010624.GC74841@mx2.yitter.info>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <7F4F844E-4AC6-45EE-9D53-9B2B29A9BEC9@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12F69)
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 08:08:55 -0400
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Originating-IP: [205.178.35.126]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GYwVf3oLc61Mv8pH7XAXEj5upAQ>
Cc: "<dnsop@ietf.org>" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 12:08:58 -0000

On May 11, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> This makes me think that what we ought to offer ICANN is a mechanism
> to make insertions into the special-names registry by different
> criteria than the protocol-shift cases.  The latter all fit neatly
> into 6761's "7 questions", but policy-based ones sort of don't.

I see your point here, but is that really the right thing to do?   It seems to me that the distinction you have drawn is a good distinction, but argues for a separate registry for "please don't send these to the root" than for "these have special non-DNS protocol uses" with points to the documents describing those uses.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email