[DNSOP] Confirmation of RFC Ed edits on RFC 8618 (draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format)

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Wed, 07 August 2019 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8742412038C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFFv9_BOOAYK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747F61203B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id d10so1328477qko.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2COOiD01UX2hGE/bR7sosc1nBjLc6tkt4CPdk0rqza4=; b=F8huzrl2lAv+Ajuc17Va46ew8tGymE6l4gB+jB3i2A7Uh9nf10WaqistpnRvfdm5Eo qJfGNwvd9SCr7PvDsWW8vq55ygDjh1UnnQlD0MAArRMP/MtM/W5cjK4mgAh+//Qh+w6h 3tv801QFoMaMllmhejiBFBHS74vbTpbwIzUNnkb6AxLyBpuXUCzK2TWqRnbiMQd3Wj9a QepKvFkuBXrsViv7nDm/Fa2a1xXgLKUocT1xaJmExLMcTPrkBv2TN7XjrSaM3VqHFBF/ Hh9Tz1TFLYtnwns7NMG28V8DmN4bMyneUHGU8fNncWgvA7ujSWdey27n5O5N8uV7QGNv nDpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2COOiD01UX2hGE/bR7sosc1nBjLc6tkt4CPdk0rqza4=; b=BkkElMfXf0a1F6RHF0uOZVXipgoeWHKS8/csAfJD83lV9jUqQwbOQdIKM4Yl8WnrrV m340tbc6yRDpYuE88ZBcG8cWdCzP8edB+qPIAMTnwgu8fKVPJgq+3HywNHXVMcl39HDy TmG0GFTdOO+b7zdk8mO0ZPux2FDKIUBChdC+djVp9Y4yk5LfTY4ldVDV8xD5YqNqrOaV FjbAt8v9zR2TQ+lKIcP6l0lLDfbx0KDopqLi0dZSgUNnFvn9H5C71TbTuHaYApkZkUfA c8S+GLtY1a+1IZXC3mjCFJaL3PvBSKsmkfUNvY+aEqo/1XabJd9oYvs+1PnHAGUZIvPq 6s8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUqMKB6ESTzaidvBOcusmRnk+roia9+ou3pw3eo4P2xkNJ4lWxP qOfNwc35MkxWZISnKq9flPwxOeRSahL3O5E6V8qHEDThEwh1kA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqws0cH27WbL4sNvTODIhDGW+doWcYvwUNmG1gmr69wa2MIpIf8qI6Na5kAaqy5V/PIs99Te4h8Y1+g1bq1Z0uc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:1661:: with SMTP id d1mr8765302qko.192.1565190954794; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:15:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ7ZgiSJHWheq6nYtqaQm+SiCDkY22-gf5ceoxwaFKL7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/GeD-lzpfnqL6_M86T2yEA2h-L84>
Subject: [DNSOP] Confirmation of RFC Ed edits on RFC 8618 (draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:15:58 -0000

Hi there,

The RFC Editor and authors have made a number of edits to improve
draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-capture-format -- I believe that they are all
good, but because there are a lot of them I'd like to give the WG the
opportunity to review and object if there are edits which you strongly
feel change the approved meaning.
Note that this isn't an opportunity to relitigate anything; this is
restricted to changes form the RFC Editor which may have significantly
changed the meaning.

I'm planning on approving on Monday Aug 12th if I don't hear otherwise.
Thanks to the RFC Editor and authors for their detail and diligence
getting the document polished.

W
-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf