Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List

Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Tue, 10 June 2008 10:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-dnsop-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D2D3A6986; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AC23A6986 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.392
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.392 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.793, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQsqeOuGPJAi for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2473A691C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [80.229.30.161] (helo=[192.168.1.6]) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1K60qh-0004Yy-B4; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:13:07 +0100
Message-ID: <484E53B2.6030404@mozilla.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:13:06 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1 (X11/2008050714)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
References: <484CFF47.1050106@mozilla.org> <20080609142926.GC83012@commandprompt.com> <484D4191.104@mozilla.org> <20080609162426.GA2596@shareable.org> <484D5A44.30603@mozilla.org> <20080609163659.GC2596@shareable.org> <484D5F3B.8040902@mozilla.org> <20080610100917.GA25910@shareable.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080610100917.GA25910@shareable.org>
X-Plusnet-Relay: 3939a635cf69600d1fbeec227b7a31ec
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Public Suffix List
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsop-bounces@ietf.org

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> The information would be published in the ISP's TLD-alike domain, not
> the customer's subdomains.  E.g. 'co.uk', not 'mybank.co.uk', assuming
> the information is "each domain $WORD.co.uk is independent".
> 
> The values are the same information that you are gathering.  The
> ISP/NIC (Nominet UK for .co.uk) does not need to contact their
> customers for this: it's a .co.uk policy.

OK. Then we are basically back to Yngve's suggestion. But this does
require universal take-up for universal support - and that, as someone
else has pointed out, makes it (in my opinion) doomed.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop