Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

[hellekin <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/07/2015 10:56 AM, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> 
> Beyond that, does it end up being a cheap way to avoid the ICANN
> process
>
*** It makes sense to follow that process for systems that use the DNS,
not for Special-Use Domain Names.  If you would read the P2PNames and
.onion drafts, you would instantly become aware of many things that
would prevent the Tor Project from registering a gTLD, first of all,
.onion is not a gTLD.

> By ‘redundant’ do you mean the IETF should take no action?
>
*** Given that ICANN already decided "to reserve the names permanently",
an action of the IETF would only confirm that these names should be
reserved by ICANN--which makes such action redundant.  I don't see
anything remotely related to any "uncertainty [that] could inhibit
experimentation/investment in the home networking space".

> 
> so the IETF should probably have quite simple and brief criteria and
> try to limit this strictly – and perhaps even make it a one-time
> activity.
> 
*** I think such criteria exist and are defined in RFC 6761.

> 
> Why not just a new RFC?
>
*** Why not using the existing RFC?

==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=qVM/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----