Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 29 February 2016 18:08 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DE41B3930 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:08:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.363
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.363 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KrP8JExIcHAu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386BE1B392E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 6737 invoked from network); 29 Feb 2016 18:08:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 29 Feb 2016 18:08:18 -0000
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:07:56 -0000
Message-ID: <20160229180756.55888.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3713017b-cbe6-f4fc-c045-074e0f684952@gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/H-eYFng1oV7cpwEj8naG3Y1du5M>
Cc: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 18:08:26 -0000
>This starts a Call for Adoption for "DNS Scoped Data Through >'_Underscore' Attribute Leaves" > >The draft is available here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf/ >Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption >by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. > >Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. This registry is long overdue (the -00 was written almost a decade ago) but better late than never. The draft is in OK shape but needs some careful work to clarify how it relates to the service name and number registry set up by RFC 6335. Service names are, as far as I can tell, used extensively in the DNS, but only as sub-names of protocol names for SRV, NAPRI, and URI records, e.g., "sip" in: _sip._udp IN SRV 0 5060 host42 The service names in the current draft should come out, and it needs language pointing to the service name registry for names used as subnames of protocol names. There is no registry of protocol names, and although it may be somewhat painful to set one up at this late date, I think it would be a good idea. The names _tcp _udp _sctp are used as protocol names in RFCs, maybe others. IANA has a Protocol Numbers registry and it's not clear to me whether we should add an optional name column to that registry (optional because most of the protocols are dead and most of the rest are not intended to carry multiple services) or a separate registry of names of live protocols that are suitable for multiple services. None of this should be terribly hard. I've discussed it with Dave and believe that he generally agrees with the direction. I'm happy to rewrite, review, whatever. R's, John PS: Speaking of rewriting, in the last paragraph of section 3, it should say "right" where it says "left".
- [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attr… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… John Levine
- [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re:… Dave Crocker
- [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption: dra… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Jared Mauch
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker