[DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 February 2016 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E8E1B3445 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJbv5mS0Mmo0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE9B1B3463 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 9so186426803iom.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QY/ZaV+eUsfjxmUbdp/DnC1VkxAI+3JW+vM4tKbORjs=; b=vv+ztlN9Qvy8F3TqslMB7Oxq+KYJMMQCvaB/HJl8CU60pVrApTggd/V/YT/TufNzTv Ljtz0BzNG5KbcLbKhar98UByIxNffwZ1m0Uey5jJ0rknu3kUkMjKVGhxIjGbA9C1HgUN AL7XSJrpBjbB7iqAbipjnlao+7SkRZL0F+OTmjoOq2opVDm97M2gpabR0L0PkiLgj6A4 UJ4UsR8kl94RUjkM0Sa+YbIsTB0qsDm5q9E5mCdcnlrcu/MFdhfOTRr+xIUcpNBwKAsQ k0nhg6gi//D0Q7KePcX+fGik21rSp0DovvzRuD9z5siWUUS0OO0qy+1uaI7No19gQhNg 4aNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QY/ZaV+eUsfjxmUbdp/DnC1VkxAI+3JW+vM4tKbORjs=; b=SyDMQJtT3h8OiKfcWWKLSdCj+P2z1sSipA+TE4Gup2H4ydpB/9AnfvbI4QrR2sarDO oIrw2hasaFeQ62XNyFCw22+TGRlCp/1O8zq4AcHmha7nJOp1LD8EVmoSFR2L+HnhomYs XeMkK6D15B31MhFZ85k8OnqHPblqSydquHBTx87hMH3Z9/XBuy4M5sqM3jvLItu7OEv6 zFzWUOybIdkX4kYfo/F/01/kFox8jePv6gb9/8Z0R7JmE/rUtRwWT44DmohHcmy98XYa AQnwFpgtD20l/Cm20edr9opEtn35mXtxaOgz31sibkUkBhOn0tTcDj74qIfavPmNNnaK Yyhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOT626Whk/43y5pMvqQfvIMxYKAC3Q5mf7pYxjpp0H3CisHy/KK/sYwMRw/VcXOIBg==
X-Received: by 10.107.32.144 with SMTP id g138mr18751654iog.33.1456760434539; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from still.local (184-19-64-38.drr03.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.19.64.38]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id qs10sm7004449igb.7.2016.02.29.07.40.32 for <dnsop@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 07:40:33 -0800 (PST)
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <3713017b-cbe6-f4fc-c045-074e0f684952@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:40:31 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/46.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/H3do97xJTenfLRNque5n4_fAv58>
Subject: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:40:42 -0000
There was some good discussion around this draft when it first appeared, and the initial idea by the author was to run this through the Apps area working group. The chairs feel it make more sense to run this through DNSOP and we urged the author to allow us the chance to give the working group a try before giving up. *Note: This draft will create an IANA registry for "underscored names". Now 10 years ago, even I would of blanched at such a thought. But there seems to have come a time where it makes sense to document the morass of these labels and offers some guidance. The discussion seemed to bear this out. This starts a Call for Adoption for "DNS Scoped Data Through '_Underscore' Attribute Leaves" The draft is available here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf/ Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view. Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. This call for adoption ends 14 March 2016. Thanks, tim wicinski DNSOP co-chair
- [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attr… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… John Levine
- [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re:… Dave Crocker
- [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption: dra… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… joel jaeggli
- Re: [DNSOP] comments ( was Re: Call for Adoption:… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Ray Bellis
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Jared Mauch
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… John R Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [DNSOP] old arguments unrelated to SRV-relate… Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-… Dave Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Stuart Cheshire
- Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was… Phillip Hallam-Baker