IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03.txt

Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org> Wed, 06 March 2019 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tale@dd.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8E1129741 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:49:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFCttzXD9fhP for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gro.dd.org (host2.dlawren-3-gw.cust.sover.net [207.136.201.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A733B124BF6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 17:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gro.dd.org (Postfix, from userid 102) id DBB3128974; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 20:49:09 -0500 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <23679.10005.882130.200077@gro.dd.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:49:09 -0500
From: Dave Lawrence <tale@dd.org>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051811170.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <155094804613.28045.8648150477440044197@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9_gVscCzr0S8A0Z23q0V1B+BZeLtDoZRSKyEJDPZ3P=KT-tw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaYo5JH6vf+djEn0O=YGhLV2AkytMg_eKQmWn=Pma5yBFQ@mail.gmail.com> <4253851.Zqd2zPpPcC@linux-9daj> <92355508-D5AC-46DC-8FF5-C1C4155601D8@isc.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903042240330.32161@bofh.nohats.ca> <23678.40176.492174.37630@gro.dd.org> <3E7AF476-0989-4FA8-8186-F5AAFC87317A@icann.org> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1903051202360.1124@bofh.nohats.ca> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051754370.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051811170.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/HIUK2ME8uHbA-cwztnrNVYRtqLc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 01:49:12 -0000

Tony Finch writes:
> If the zone has a mixture of lame and working servers, the lame servers
> should not trigger serve-stale, because the resolver still needs to try
> asking the working servers.

Yes, complete agreement.  That is the thrust of what the document says.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email