Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0383A15EB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 075VwZFXJXkG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D863A15ED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [86.85.149.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36AD36A020; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from plato ([86.85.149.247]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id NYHfC/j1AmEjDwAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:52 +0200
Message-ID: <b9af7b62d0fd1697eb8988d4edc5ef7284e28957.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/HR7GEgefB-ZWIBQv0biqRqt95QY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:40:22 -0000

On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 17:04 +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> Dear WG,
> 
> We have updated the agenda for DNSOP WG session II on Thursday 29 July. 
>   The updated agenda is uploaded to datatracker: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-06

On this version, I see under New Working Group Business a draft (the
black lies sentinel) that was posted two days ago. Can somebody please
explain to me what the purpose of the draft cutoff is, if drafts can
appear in the datatracker, and on an agenda, after the cutoff?

In the latest version (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-07)
, I see the new business has now been moved -in front- of both current
business, and the discussion on prioritisation of WG activities.

This is not a comment on the specific draft at all. This is a comment
on WG process. It seems weird to me to discuss prioritisation -after-
we spend time talking about current and, especially, new business.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/