Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated
Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 18:40 UTC
Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0383A15EB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 075VwZFXJXkG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D863A15ED for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [86.85.149.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36AD36A020; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from plato ([86.85.149.247]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id NYHfC/j1AmEjDwAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:52 +0200
Message-ID: <b9af7b62d0fd1697eb8988d4edc5ef7284e28957.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:39:50 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/HR7GEgefB-ZWIBQv0biqRqt95QY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 18:40:22 -0000
On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 17:04 +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote: > Dear WG, > > We have updated the agenda for DNSOP WG session II on Thursday 29 July. > The updated agenda is uploaded to datatracker: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-06 On this version, I see under New Working Group Business a draft (the black lies sentinel) that was posted two days ago. Can somebody please explain to me what the purpose of the draft cutoff is, if drafts can appear in the datatracker, and on an agenda, after the cutoff? In the latest version ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/materials/agenda-111-dnsop-07) , I see the new business has now been moved -in front- of both current business, and the discussion on prioritisation of WG activities. This is not a comment on the specific draft at all. This is a comment on WG process. It seems weird to me to discuss prioritisation -after- we spend time talking about current and, especially, new business. Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
- [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updat… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Joe Abley
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Shumon Huque
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Benno Overeinder
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Peter van Dijk
- Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda u… Peter van Dijk