[DNSOP] DNSKEY Flags vs. CDS/CDNSKEY

Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org> Fri, 07 February 2014 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <muks@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054C91A044B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kA2H1UbzLh_f for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:31:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.banu.com (mail.banu.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:140:644b::225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7A21A0203 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from totoro.home.mukund.org (unknown [115.118.107.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.banu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67E0BE60088; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:31:32 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 00:01:27 +0530
From: Mukund Sivaraman <muks@isc.org>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <20140207183127.GA32053@totoro.home.mukund.org>
References: <CAJE_bqe95pn8rHvK3UffPDn+_rGYiq2G5sfdgqisH4JG7gFjBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_i+Jt4Ok+CddheGT_nA=e4srgbUSQy98GeQ9qGn_Cncjag@mail.gmail.com> <52F52215.9090709@dougbarton.us> <CAHw9_i+Aanz5NZVO5Q_x=1zyFzHZSmeU6yoLx3cDkwD2sC-XMA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+Aanz5NZVO5Q_x=1zyFzHZSmeU6yoLx3cDkwD2sC-XMA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: [DNSOP] DNSKEY Flags vs. CDS/CDNSKEY
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 18:31:36 -0000

Hi Warren

Did you see my reply to your email a few weeks ago where I asked why new
CDS/CDNSKEY RR types are required instead of adding a new bit to the
Flags field of the DNSKEY RR. Please can you look for my last email
which lists some advantages? There may be a good reason for it, but I
don't want you to miss considering it. :)

		Mukund