[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Persistence of DCV, including for Delegated DCV (for draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 06 June 2025 21:39 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625BE31F2169 for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id da-aZBl4Oopj for <dnsop@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D458D31F2163 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-E2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.7]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 556Ld0mB021003 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 6 Jun 2025 21:39:00 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:38:58 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 14:38:58 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] [Ext] Persistence of DCV, including for Delegated DCV (for draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques)
Thread-Index: AQHb1ytp2ENkHmetQkWPeWpBJwQZoA==
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 21:38:58 +0000
Message-ID: <F7E48A3F-DA2C-4E54-92DA-90CD0EDE78DA@icann.org>
References: <CAKC-DJhS4_1P5Bqu-0YWWr9jkxBOt40rx5804UAUp7DhAsc31g@mail.gmail.com> <40408285-974A-4790-B653-DF4C3798F1E0@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <40408285-974A-4790-B653-DF4C3798F1E0@nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1631A83F89817A4CB1ED1945E817E847@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1099,Hydra:6.0.736,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-06-06_08,2025-06-05_01,2025-03-28_01
Message-ID-Hash: W3ZJT3RPB2ZGGYPM65LGAEFTL7XBC6X7
X-Message-ID-Hash: W3ZJT3RPB2ZGGYPM65LGAEFTL7XBC6X7
X-MailFrom: paul.hoffman@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Persistence of DCV, including for Delegated DCV (for draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/HVdkKuDTXnGT3Fj-aHYNkXmuCS0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

On Jun 6, 2025, at 14:16, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 6, 2025, at 15:02, Erik Nygren <erik+ietf@nygren.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Following this discussion, I've taken a pass at proposing some updates to clarify the "purpose"
>> of domain validation (as suggested by Ben in PR #160 although I started with a new take on it)
>> as well as to clarify the difference between one-off validation and persistent validation.
>> See:
>> 
>> https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/172/files [github.com]
>>  
> 
> This looks good to me.

This is an OK start, but it would be better if the draft covered the actual security issues (on-path attackers) and dealt with time more carefully. Persistent validation doesn't need the token that is needed by the initial validation.

The new material still doesn't explain why introducing a new mechanism (intermediaries) should be part of a Best Current Practice RFC.

--Paul Hoffman