From nobody Mon Jul 26 18:08:15 2021
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD823A0CDF
 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9BVbhnfIlAaM for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12e.google.com (mail-il1-x12e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B738D3A0CC7
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id r1so10681458iln.6
 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; 
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=CP51VRGNLTbxIAgv1RIg8APd+J7fCJPoWm8d1a0+D+4=;
 b=jXsQzVfuHPGdUM1TUBmo1SPmw4Avv9w3o7tJGShCZl4T0aDZOjiKJ/sei+xtimKFOx
 TMEa1yo7zvHJsGB7INNyNkmIDTdzxcTueLWwSbLZZDyax+HPGgB4W0CTZgTaXeCovSE9
 OXvV7JrZPiY7BvazFfxMIcmjMlawPL6LdsrvfC+NltlKNZsZje4h0jCn26wi6aYLrUbe
 uWravn6dc7NS0v1e5CPkDWVFSgqjs1P39OR4JGcaMZpgteV49KNowG1LzN9ePf0+v5Vu
 DoSe8Q2qq+HCqSNJj+DZpzGx4Gwfy+ZLUOIntjuDJ99cdncPt0Ds5Bwnvx8g8HcIpOY6
 GzCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=CP51VRGNLTbxIAgv1RIg8APd+J7fCJPoWm8d1a0+D+4=;
 b=gjkv29twPa8jMLs5JjljkjOZeH2NZJzUNgd5qr0nmfLUFvOFhHXLvz8j+eTpN2W12k
 bsWFnu1t7p88yWl0YVImLUty4vfhA1dAgw5hrXcMURulxmi8bBu/5DVMycRXdKf82dC4
 Df1ppZC2yyfhGEZG1b+mPjHQ+Pcm93nkl1to44uZLf3hJYEZTE82rJdr+54gCFh56fqj
 fzDRu2hL6jBYCWsY6euNegpEh4bHqGfAKOu3qKTsiob84KZK3SOOKcb5hg126If8CZ1E
 1NPnScQW7/AdPzPjC4EiZa80Llr5Gk8flGjAk7IlpiexnulvtIszbdSH6PLYRqj2bTaV
 mwng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fr7piQ2kbrusqrPZVfFXI5ixVr6ZTedjsXXIeBZizTnKKVg1c
 Xe3/Cf2fG7Ylq7ATZOHCt6t5sKbUgE1G8PQ19xB/NXdwwpo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJycjID8SSM5vKJR7cAGx68SOjIVEwJ44lAjQhBUXA8SOoKJfHbAxWK2IRVgXQSYPwwneEkTRN5TZPSim3In8QQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1d8d:: with SMTP id
 h13mr14957813ila.40.1627348080672; 
 Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1266434-EF95-4A7E-A167-D5B8F2C1A25F@dnss.ec>
 <CAF4+nEE662dWKwXS_ZYMmD8h4HoUAmwTS+hemRsb7rAOBxuJuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <3078B0A5-1FE1-4407-9260-987A52A9FA69@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <3078B0A5-1FE1-4407-9260-987A52A9FA69@rfc1035.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 21:07:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEHODWB3k+Z+3XkhHw4Y-6BSjQEjY4tLEohue4nt07Attw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Hupf5aZprftw76u5ya5soRJdtIc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Draft-ietf-dnsop-private-use-tld and the ISO
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>,
 <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 01:08:13 -0000

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:02 PM Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:
>
> > On 27 Jul 2021, at 01:56, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Looks like initial query from IAB to ISO is
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1720/
> >
> > Maybe I'm blind but I don't see a response...
>
> It can take a day or so for inbound Liaison Statements from other SDOs to=
 make their way to the datatracker. It can take a *lot* longer than that fo=
r an SDO to send a response. I think ISO is one of the organisations where =
a reply depends on how frequently the appropriate committee or whatever mee=
ts.

The slide point quoted implies that the reply has already been
received, has been assessed by the liaison manager, and that
assessment sent to the WG Chairs.

Thanks,
Donald
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@gmail.com

