Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03.txt

[Tim Wicinski <[e-mail]>]

"Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them
(instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy
developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations."

I totally agree here.  It also makes it easier if the document passed WGLC
and moves along the standards process train.

Tim


On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:51 PM Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Following up on my previous message:
>
> The document is actively confusing about recommendations.
>
> - Section 4 has the actual update to the RFC 1035, and that update
> contains MAY and SHOULD statements.
>
> - Section 5 is called "Example Method" but also contains recommendations.
>
> - Section 6, "Implementation Caveats" also has recommendations. A
> subsection, "6.1. Implementation Considerations" has more recommendations.
>
> Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them
> (instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy
> developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>