Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03.txt

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 March 2019 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A2B130E92 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 17:33:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G2G8Nm_Zhwc0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 17:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12a.google.com (mail-it1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43DAF130E8D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 17:33:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id m137so5068352ita.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 17:33:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hMAzhT7ymwjj4z9Uj1RIU9v0QL+C1FW0ikYhIR5tV80=; b=PegtgREi/LnzpE3TDkHaHta0Gdo1gUFXjXq9C0RsFGiCOv8EHl7Q/fRp5L83fEijqN vx4IQH3YTJMpZECSrX+cAFX5SUcSD4JVqC+9vDT1tRTZc0e9D6frTjp77yjD1onp1DaY PkzpPiCQjk8T62gE4ivaDu90Wp4eC1n1lrKYJ1HAupE8aEnCj0vswZiCA7kp4ZXaWAUI 8fWoECkaPIkoCo1cPsrYbVdJUftGdwFhCN6HUMpe2Xc0e5My4gbcBn2DrpoffamL3F2Q 2E+IG1Nkg7OI/G5A+UdhBt6AMmw2Ofi7uu10IxqZoc9aOwEeXT/M3WAfJlDTF1eHAItx CZGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hMAzhT7ymwjj4z9Uj1RIU9v0QL+C1FW0ikYhIR5tV80=; b=ODbU+WjMYZLN12+edWfPzQpqG5UwElsXTbQlOUVwlBS36WaYTNg24IsWuMG3suytBn LE8Ehh3jrGcJjIexYoz19hvPP7Y89Y8UXcuRI/jy73rmB90UlO2dordbZXZzqw7U+HTG zjkxFgAZGSL8/FHm6SIXDjCIG/ea+pxXdPO2jTLonheJjw9hd/d06Egw5ceC5rZsmwoR T6jLWAnC56J8Y5HPZsS1wVzOPVymXG3qPuQLObikI38E2IVXCC4ADYQr1Wcj6HElM4Sb UXWg5H/1ZQNDntwvwHPlI/NbDRK7X53OtNFIT/aZRAAdyCS+AuVnHKhaSWshAEJGhIh0 0qRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWMKGONWM9z7QVMVcUeA8TP9XBaLwA9qhyCh926kvnbGzldfLjy yzW4yxz8pS+P+b8iFGKxohepxysV7LHCIRDoUfRL//LY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYZMKP/ZOvbTluOEngIEOXr4z7R1HRxiDiUFIQIqPhRvk7L1DtFwzAuB7JMCzQmBKQq2xV7iTNzRZci0tkwKIE=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:1dd8:: with SMTP id 207mr8215783itj.109.1551663230096; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 17:33:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155094804613.28045.8648150477440044197@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+nkc8DvZr84E46vna91iBsJ2uSVsda1cCzyTNx9C_J85uKW1w@mail.gmail.com> <23673.27866.35423.674591@gro.dd.org> <FD2C124D-BD1E-41AE-B4AB-007E451A32D6@icann.org> <53DB1048-2B9C-43CA-A6FD-C423DE0254B3@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <53DB1048-2B9C-43CA-A6FD-C423DE0254B3@icann.org>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 20:33:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FOQdEDSAbVtysDkELuJdp_-igKh3WAY-UJQZPxRWtYrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a419f805833abf9e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I5_9iciRsHQvlxA5z1OJyIEpP0U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-serve-stale-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2019 01:33:54 -0000

"Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them
(instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy
developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations."

I totally agree here.  It also makes it easier if the document passed WGLC
and moves along the standards process train.

Tim


On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:51 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> Following up on my previous message:
>
> The document is actively confusing about recommendations.
>
> - Section 4 has the actual update to the RFC 1035, and that update
> contains MAY and SHOULD statements.
>
> - Section 5 is called "Example Method" but also contains recommendations.
>
> - Section 6, "Implementation Caveats" also has recommendations. A
> subsection, "6.1. Implementation Considerations" has more recommendations.
>
> Proposal: Put all recommendations in Section 4, and talk about them
> (instead of introducing them) in the other sections. That way, a lazy
> developer who only reads Section 4 will know all the recommendations.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>