Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Thu, 21 March 2019 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8477C13125C; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0JgPr05fAxO; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC2213124A; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 16:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCDC4242109D; Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:04:49 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCir4A9Af5FfG4YqiqxjEHDYmqdFZLwa6+Y6HJwLTM0id8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:04:49 +0000
Cc: DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0B61AFCD-00D1-4831-881E-FDA232AFC305@rfc1035.com>
References: <155218771419.28706.1428072426137578566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1914607.BasjITR8KA@linux-9daj> <CA+9kkMAYR19CCCLN00A5Oy_=9Z97FQogCz-vdC=M7Ffn47fTgQ@mail.gmail.com> <1900056.F7IrilhNgi@linux-9daj> <CA+9kkMCgmzjbPM+DTUYuS3OsT+wOCmsyaGPg6fPu=w-ibL=NrA@mail.gmail.com> <5F768C24-4ECF-4369-9D51-B90C4426409B@fl1ger.de> <428d5ff2b5704cdf956a5919e330e4dc@cira.ca> <CAH1iCir4A9Af5FfG4YqiqxjEHDYmqdFZLwa6+Y6HJwLTM0id8w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I7cNQwP9NKkJRrtE9i2etLwL0mM>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Doh] New I-D: draft-reid-doh-operator
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:04:54 -0000


> On 21 Mar 2019, at 22:29, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 3:03 PM Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira..ca> wrote:
>> Plus! 
>> Is anyone looking at adding DoH and DoT servers as part of DHCP/SLAAC?  So the local resolver and apps and browsers can go the _appropriate_ name resolution resource(s) using the protocol of choice. That would be much simpler for default configuration in enterprise and ISP.
> 
> I think that is a good starting place for the side meeting discussion.

Nope.

It could be a topic for *another* side meeting. But not the one that’s under consideration here. That side discussion is supposed to be about the contents of draft-reid-doh-operator, draft-livingood-doh-implementation-risks-issues and maybe draft-bertola-bcp-doh-clients. And what to do about those drafts.

I’m not so sure a side meeting on DHCP/SLAAC for DoT/DoH discovery is needed -- at least, not yet -- because there is a live discovery draft and work item already in progress in the DoH WG. That would seem to be the most appropriate place to first raise those issues.