Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 01 October 2019 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2ABD1200A1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m8PG68Z8TUi0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9489F120077 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (unknown [192.168.1.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FC8C2A4E6F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:22:17 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <yblwodp2xkx.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:22:15 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-Id: <15B56708-EDDA-4EDF-81AD-EC11BFD60717@dukhovni.org>
References: <156962713660.24718.71133858140531907@ietfa.amsl.com> <CEC273B9-3EE4-4DEB-BA38-FCF90819C0AF@dukhovni.org> <yblwodp2xkx.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/I8DZzklm4wX29yqkCy9IW3ZoFbg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 01:22:21 -0000

> On Sep 30, 2019, at 7:06 PM, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:
> 
>> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
>> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors?  Such as
>> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired, and some not
>> yet vlid.
> 
> Yes, the draft discusses including multiple EDE reports.

I appears that text discussing the possibility of multiple EDE values
present in earlier drafts may have been inadvertently removed in -07.
I think such text should be restored, making it clear that the OPT
record may contain multiple pertinent EDE values.

-- 
	Viktor.