[DNSOP] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 08 June 2024 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E817CC1522B9; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_0XjUAJqlb7; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6795C157915; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=c6Yx/BJFK+lScCPoN8OGeFFKYJvHpB/O5ADJrJQ44Vw=; b=v2mWm8SRN6OJ+5XAJGy6OyMHF3 mRmFfEdvlaFGrpb0MjLWf4B8obVgL0UUv8kqGIDKIArhxc7wFr/0ji9Gsv1yO43Sm2aeAEk1k/ZqC 0xP1d+PebGJHy2sdGgGuyD/leMIeTeUWMnLr9fC4yU5iKQHymReko2/WHKqHzEqe8nlOj54zFo0N+ 6Wa5P3dfWYfBncjAuyVkeo/whPXk9qiiH6cSP0NwVK+h5/5UTtA/J82NK3PVe1NLXEC81mWsSgYj2 sgUp8EQWHGFWmoEYeb6/H7rROWivrC5Cz9e2w+n4gSozipzeUvwpWL+ViUGGoKIU6dnPk6kGlXuni Qut5BL4g==;
Received: from [172.58.211.174] (port=62354 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1sFmNz-00ENdg-2z; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 23:04:55 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21E35239-3870-495D-B71B-BBDF1BA7D47B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <89871798-2bc5-4b6b-b490-e8f0ce3115de@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:04:43 -0700
Message-Id: <D858C50E-54E5-4E1D-BA86-6C0A5E529BDD@strayalpha.com>
References: <171765694296.11836.1686812500783472443@ietfa.amsl.com> <708F130C-9ADE-40AA-AE1F-CD61F0C8FDB2@verisign.com> <89871798-2bc5-4b6b-b490-e8f0ce3115de@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Message-ID-Hash: GIRO663ZEX3UIDRPWEYT4QJT3R6IF2GK
X-Message-ID-Hash: GIRO663ZEX3UIDRPWEYT4QJT3R6IF2GK
X-MailFrom: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "Wessels, Duane" <dwessels@verisign.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ICfCe-GVyfLvsibVfqvw2Hsxewo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, all,

> On Jun 7, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Shawn Emery <shawn.emery@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 6/6/24 1:53 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>> 
>> Thank you for the review and comments.
>> 
>> We’ve fixed the editorial comments you identified.
>> 
>> Regarding “decimal integer” — we use that phrase only when describing the
>> presentation format (versus, say, hexadecimal) so we think it is appropriate.
>> 
>> However, we would defer to the advice or suggestion of the RFC editor or
>> other experts on this, if they have an opinion.
> 
> My first intuition was that a decimal is an integer with a fractional component.  However, precedence in this area has more credence than my intuition ;)

Decimal refers to the base-10 number system, i.e., integer powers of 10 (both positive, zero, and negative). Octal is the same for base 8; hexadecimal for base 10. All can be integer or floating point.

Base number systems use a separator called a “radix point” to indicate the boundary between non-negative and negative powers. When the radix point is used in the decimal system, it is called the decimal point. IMO that can be considered a contraction of “decimal radix point”.

Finally, integers don’t have fractional parts. Floating point numbers do, though.

Joe