Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 04 July 2017 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9CC13189E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9itor0Vq1gl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23DD41315FE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b40so57126440qtb.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bFtdKImyVeWgMcWbEVh+l51Oz8dDVKMn9yJXspDRaik=; b=o4ffzbXpnQNnWcPwkCozdShAFN0x+GvaMOzFegL5CiMU4ehb51Zr+PtBeek+nMtIlo zdIzJ0HRg7udTHRk/I/FcefHXCR8hNaeY3QzcC1HO7zsu1D6eY1IYAATNtbM/H6Pv6mb y/X99aVN0G4fL/7/iS68kzMxNdz1J0eeoNS3b+uNWc2NNSLpK3wB1JVvRDZCS+aw4SQa O8u+v5C9C2Mgs3BPHM65nno+21AcXNuN2xHexn1lKx2esZePRt43le7IVB60/LAUDz2B e0K6BfY9qgYVLHms5HC0CeM7haptoR7CoZJolSb0Nadj33Co+fyvrt8p1MKGnNA6Ti0P 4gUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bFtdKImyVeWgMcWbEVh+l51Oz8dDVKMn9yJXspDRaik=; b=YEeN5OyLMhfvjRQld3o95t5clrKsuZ4y8cp6dTVZChBLbKwdDnpiqsGWq8O+42hVF6 uVVs3ZM4jVMZtHxY57xf8zuqVKx/KfEtkHQolADQwU6GSmPwbiZPeelb9RLHjH8byExu 0enRAonjm7iTyX9Wb0p3CApKpPNQR2MEHT91sKFAletAOQBeCqAGtQfXyuiN4PA40jsp yEnrN2j7/3v7QO7+XrKrOUNBpJcqhd4YjBBpeffXb06wKgzow1FfU36AdXHc4Qp8c3V4 NtL8GPQfeHnvrBO5r0UEPUDCzyxBra/O05oYhSS25ScnWRT8kae/YQMGbujbd4LfGuu2 bOMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112sqTPmicjsiPVOwXsgAlvTK1iK7Mr6BDdz1LUut6pqrN95MQnc K3y+S53vJZIM9Tjp
X-Received: by 10.237.48.225 with SMTP id 88mr17839861qtf.17.1499175729237; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.114] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j75sm13632154qke.34.2017.07.04.06.42.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-C7F39176-8C3A-4238-8F80-116006D97642
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A5304i)
In-Reply-To: <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:42:07 -0400
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop@ietf.org, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A70FD34B-000A-4748-B1B2-BF6DF66C7D6C@fugue.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com> <m2a84kzm4y.wl-randy@psg.com> <F98FEA1C-3F3F-4344-8B07-996AAD899CC2@fugue.com> <m2shicxr0h.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IDfdc_RHjPXP5aa_PwK4KOozwD0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:42:12 -0000

On Jul 4, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; wrote:
> how depressing.  one obvious curiousity is who asked the one-sided
> question?  otoh, maybe i don't want to know.  but i wish you had
> perceived a wider responsibility to the community.

It was discussed at length in the working group, so I would say that you could In principle have raised this concern sooner. However, I will admit that it didn’t occur to me to do so either. In any case, it really is a separate issue from that covered by this draft, and so there’s no reason why we can’t do this work if you think it’s worth doing. Given the situation with ICANN and GTLD, it may be moot, but I wouldn’t mind writing it down.