IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> Fri, 26 July 2024 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C354C1D4A93; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Khqmcpq4iJzS; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppa2.lax.icann.org (ppa2.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10B0DC18DB9F; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (out.mail.icann.org [64.78.33.6]) by ppa2.lax.icann.org (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTPS id 46Q0eE4t031307 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:40:14 GMT
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.128) by MBX112-W2-CO-2.pexch112.icann.org (10.226.41.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:40:13 -0700
Received: from MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) by MBX112-W2-CO-1.pexch112.icann.org ([169.254.44.235]) with mapi id 15.02.1544.011; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:40:13 -0700
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05
Thread-Index: AQHa3jEEXpk+DwJJ/EakAXQlYeloG7IIMrkAgAAa5YCAAFQZgA==
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 00:40:13 +0000
Message-ID: <45EC9FD1-0BB2-4A11-81FD-45773CF9B0AC@icann.org>
References: <172187050118.964090.10149522399960549817@dt-datatracker-659f84ff76-9wqgv> <942FEC5A-D81C-4677-AC0C-927536D4D98A@icann.org> <BN9PR11MB537101E6AD2E555FD19C5A5BB8AB2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB537101E6AD2E555FD19C5A5BB8AB2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.0.32.234]
x-source-routing-agent: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <60AB585E7FE9F446875725E1AEAF7431@pexch112.icann.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-07-25_26,2024-07-25_03,2024-05-17_01
Message-ID-Hash: JZWZBA2A34ZMDRVZJZBKDGSTRHI6CL5B
X-Message-ID-Hash: JZWZBA2A34ZMDRVZJZBKDGSTRHI6CL5B
X-MailFrom: paul.hoffman@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [Ext] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-05
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ISw12iBroAH9T_mVirRNmV-IB5E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Thanks for following up. I've removed text about places were we are already fixing the text.

On Jul 25, 2024, at 12:39, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > First, in Section 3 why not just say that RD bit MUST NOT be set?  Why leave it
> > to a MAY when setting the bit is undefined?  Seems like the more prescriptive
> > you are the better.
> 
> Some systems might set RD to 1 for all queries, such as due to lazy programming. Setting it to 1 does no harm to anyone.
>  [JMC] Been there.  Would it make sense, then, to say, “server MUST ignore RD”?

No, and for similar reasons. Some authoritative server software might pay attention to it, and there is no downside for it doing so.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status