[DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 04 November 2017 03:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4ACC13FAE0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 20:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XiUf_93Zuo7p for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 20:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D546413FADC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 20:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p75so4643388wmg.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 20:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bF2iLTn3bEV982giMU5UJduKVAcZZw7RVsxEKuCtvwc=; b=iZIqoujqCBKNYp/dEkQKcg9uc4JnAtd63lryxglrtd2g7RdQWOipurBlHrfU4Owkjs IiYe2U+4f6dQZkj0xxraRSecAft5wu4EL0GsH5Bh7A4swZqksDcqUwPtBiIVDINDx13z 5wwyNbBQE115y75/ZK1Q8V1yuM8z+zz/d0x8HxtIXA492LDnscTKAdMdSp8P3byEuM9c PdgADwLejiOOFDF3BbSAPDsK1JAY5AtoOUmepj08ataLoChXfnmjboPqShr2QOSAnbsc m3U/8ZCdPSNjeSu2bNqc1hV+ZQq+/W/RYYmyWPW/sdxC9MkOXIAIv6jNbk6Qnev59ZMZ IiTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bF2iLTn3bEV982giMU5UJduKVAcZZw7RVsxEKuCtvwc=; b=JYN1C2DCtI42lldD7SWwIJyL8Nz+a2YW2IYN2fyOvIIRKr7qrey+voD1gbkv2UgvC3 8wWb0JXjP7j6wLfZfxH2JXsVOZM7GOo/q+0k1jPWgz9nV7EI/sNTonZFiHShpjS5lOHA OtnATQ5x4DqaOJfV0ycxheHpHa5KUhbC4BB6PuReeE49mJMEiyXfToucK9wmNVG0slMp XGhmmjgC5FouDc9A6kBy+CEoprZVkFYv+wHA6POT0MlXK/NEd8+7Gg1sLHw4y3q1QwFA aUPFHVyq2s7owmYrcQm8lMnDBnnF4rWmrRGJAaYRthAliq/LFEDrEBxZmSl8ymVhBTNn 9S1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX5GuJhJoStxS4oIZUgRo4zP/bedO9f3C2L0ELG5y5xnLyU9Fekh 0sC5aIOBURSiegPZI+qowXpXp+TaYj3oV+fu+jLUqw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TLohC8TFOYQU1kekTcmZSVHphRwVY+ybpwy8Zni2JBEm3mWHfL94l9IuL+C/YqOJSpYGXAD0+BgcgRISuv6V4=
X-Received: by 10.28.47.201 with SMTP id v192mr639302wmv.98.1509764874956; Fri, 03 Nov 2017 20:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.184.60 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 20:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:07:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HJyM5aUe4UpmU3vuzjaqOkzvC1+_bpvYd=dv93yzAewg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1142490810f3bd055d1f878b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IbsSy4F5hxk0arNiQyljgwXWcGU>
Subject: [DNSOP] Agenda for IETF100
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2017 03:07:59 -0000

All,

Here's the latest agenda for IETF100 in Singapore.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/agenda-100-dnsop/

This should take into account all requests for time as of this afternoon.
Definitely email if something was missed.  I don't plan on major changes at
this point.

As you can see, we have time for our Monday Morning slot of 2.5 hours.
Because of this, we're currently planning on giving back the Thursday
meeting slot.

Since the Monday meeting is *first thing* Monday Morning, I will be
expecting slides by Sunday afternoon 12 November.

I am arriving in Singapore this coming Wednesday 8 November, as  I have a
few days in the local office.

thanks and see folks in Singapore

tim

-------
# DNS Operations (DNSOP) Working Group
## IETF 100, Singapore
### Session I

* Date: Monday 13 November 2017
* Time: 09:30-1200 SGT (UTC+8)
* Room: Padang

* Chairs: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>;
* Chairs: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>;

* Secretary: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>;

* IESG Overlord: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>;

* [DocList](https://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/wg/dnsop/doclist.html)
* [DataTracker](https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/documents/)

---
## Agenda

### Administrivia

* Agenda Bashing, Blue Sheets, etc,  10 min

* Updates of Old Work, Chairs, 10 min

---
### Current Working Group Business

* [draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis-07). Hoffman,
15min
    Chairs feel we are closing in on WGLC, but need reviewers

* [draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations-07),
Hardaker, 10min
    WGLC ended with lack of consensus and gaping questions.

* [draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-00), Hardeker,
10min
    questions from 16 October

* [draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-let-localhost-be-localhost-01),
Random HTTP Person, 10min
    resolve any loose threads from adopted version

* [draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellis-dnsop-xpf-03), Bellis, 10min
    lots of push back last time

---
### New Working Group Business

* [draft-fujiwara-dnsop-additional-answers](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-additional-answers-00),
Fujiwara, 15min
    another multiple responses idea, with code

* [draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mglt-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-06),
Migault, 10min
    Authors feel this should be a WG document?

* [draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-02), Huston, 10min
    does the working group feel as a useful option?

* [draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dupont-dnsop-rfc2845bis-00), Dupont, 10min
    this addresses the TSIG bug from this summer

* [draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal](
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dnsop-internal-00), Kumari, 10min