IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Fri, 09 April 2021 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F793A1ECD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJOEIqxfbtVB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665AD3A1ECA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 05:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [84.81.54.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14E1C6A016; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:07:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from plato ([84.81.54.175]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id who2BI5DcGBzRAAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Fri, 09 Apr 2021 14:07:42 +0200
Message-ID: <a593834266671b593dcbec2f4de3acfe266135b2.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 14:07:41 +0200
In-Reply-To: <d37863a8-cb12-ebec-d148-5908dabf7b26@isc.org>
References: <CADyWQ+Hg=XcMjT5BOxeV0F25sAT5QSZOEcdMHZiH1s0sS=1KzQ@mail.gmail.com> <9af6a2c1-70af-0ea6-52a5-36ae13159fdd@isc.org> <CAHbrMsDyWHwZiX-EAm_Qa9Ve6nk4ZrAgWN_Y+LgQoTq-NJoriw@mail.gmail.com> <d37863a8-cb12-ebec-d148-5908dabf7b26@isc.org>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IggD0tu0xDlSNFjCrypZUKRmd7I>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 12:07:49 -0000

On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 08:58 +0200, Petr Špaček wrote:
> On 08. 04. 21 16:39, Ben Schwartz wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback, Petr.  I think the easiest solution is to relax 
> > the requirement language.  I've proposed a change here: 
> > https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/313 
> > <https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc/pull/313>
> 
> Copying the diff here:
> 
> > - Recursive resolvers SHOULD treat the SvcParams portion of the SVCB RR
> > - as opaque and SHOULD NOT try to alter their behavior based
> > - on its contents.
> > 
> > + Recursive resolvers MAY treat the SvcParams portion of the SVCB RR
> > + as opaque.  No part of this specification requires recursive resolvers
> > + to alter their behavior based on its contents, even if the contents are
> > + invalid.
> 
> This addresses my concern, thank you!

+1, thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email