IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Mon, 20 March 2017 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27B129564 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGYZiBfW5bYb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8363B12955F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id d188so64176727vka.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+TnTIL/bS3P23gST76fmfkcGG/Yzq5kZvlSOy4AKc2M=; b=V+bVOUh3bbZkVX9ONpjZHaGqC4Tb9V5chlP4b35R8MuWC2rLxEYQ/LRGsQ4rGLvmQ8 9infUlyy1Fpgb2zpCp6uLn/+2ctnmFINaKB5oOIvWN4DFhXulUqdxxU+JqWvYwi3XcGn ikWUgfR59+53dxCiU7zUQ3RbkITpaRkV26/XNhoKrz0s65IZ6PX8MSP/8A0qzuokzyR8 WTRi+l89rk2lT0wQYlXGfwCGAkVxMb7ONf6obH7gh6D/gumvSBQuL6sbt3p2Frfvewa0 w1CWdvLV0nYJFMJ5EodlCedQEnkLceufkCGHSlGvu0J38RnMAkZLSD2uKOs9lzEQlIaC xHUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+TnTIL/bS3P23gST76fmfkcGG/Yzq5kZvlSOy4AKc2M=; b=Xpfezlt827a3Y4RQPAygT6uswK+85yzYBZun94mTQOsLidfD5sw+Dbwxdj4skJdXmN MbNIidqU9zulcNMGCYbCbYe3501dl9LWW30gEUhjOIDT/kXESDB558gu3jc/Ii5Uu7uI LG2VNaJSS9e75Tbg6yXb0DJuOZM2+jpHadrV/+BXtdnPo+m0sK9ygSVNmepmwVrEAuIt U8BNrup2gUuKEl8ackOSfqTpEHjLAVL2XS3zOToYcfddza5GBotpsjdxrQzAchFMyQRT hYEKBo8rF61jxUeNtzfvSrVHUAAz0iRSktAvd72MeXwOw2/CF9o1N2UBylERkhv5soq+ cxRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H31ZEMYno6SFDfqempS/zIG8G12HJJ07CiKIAUnV0XFGY2GYoxp0jYaAxn4aPFrm4I1IFeny0w9CWgVHw==
X-Received: by 10.31.67.209 with SMTP id q200mr10752938vka.43.1489982789372; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.72.218 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 21:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dd8:b:99:9dd3:1e91:b8a6:9f35]
In-Reply-To: <6DDEFD26-A6ED-4E26-B5C0-1D1EEFFD509A@vpnc.org>
References: <1E14B142-680B-4E30-809B-68E03EB6E326@gmail.com> <6DDEFD26-A6ED-4E26-B5C0-1D1EEFFD509A@vpnc.org>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 14:06:28 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn0=bGKom=fJ9C7Y3ChCgH5H+nZ-nKJjMyTFLAc1_1xC-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/InIRj_IfsMKaQS8ExTHE8DVp2Rg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 04:06:33 -0000

Where's the measurement of existing use?

Do we understand to what extent this label is already in use, and
potentially has operational issues?

-G

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2017, at 18:44, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The INT Area Director who oversees the homenet WG, Terry Manderson, has
>> asked DNSOP participants to review
>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt
>> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt>, "Special Use Top
>> Level Domain '.homenet’”, with the following aspects in mind:
>>
>> 1) in terms of RFC6761
>>
>> 2) in terms of the _operational_ position of an unsigned entry in the root
>> zone as requested in this document, to break the chain of trust for local
>> DNS resolution of .homenet names.
>>
>> This document is the product of the homenet WG, which has asked the IESG
>> to approve it for publication, so our comments are strictly advisory to the
>> IESG. There was some discussion of the draft on this list shortly after it
>> appeared, in November 2016, but it’s always the AD’s prerogative to ask for
>> additional review.
>
>
> Clarifying question for Terry: do you want us reviewing it now, or after he
> has released it for IETF Last Call? I ask because the draft's authors are
> aware that there are still a bunch of 6761-ish issues (from two different
> reviewers, of which I am one), so there might be refinements coming before
> IETF Last Call, or maybe not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email