Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 16 September 2016 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD29012B365 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9i0rKsNOSoTt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E727412B360 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id h127so75538224lfh.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jWEqtA+5EytBYVR/nvpY3pY9CIYKS7xIYZmx0htPTHY=; b=JxqrPUueo/CaqPWUeZ2tOHGWFahw3S+sR4lLz6Wp1DOWMS76r7GfQuObGmQ5frJWvb 0+XZRM2Jmr5MBs1sePnQw4jGnH+4Wo5aOhTWM8ysUBCegoJ+ejX15RGvalJAjSFHoqDU 5GSmohXQS5WAxLRWTPRDeHgLS2I+eUXRkGcbt2w8wKBjIp6zCaFB2i43+hG80I034jY1 jAd3QNptl9LZ73Sl6HtxbHoT7/jwPBfb0OMRp8L7zgQUziCN30d3QYEPk2ucNDomtkWs ffpRu3PyZL9bf8HR/wz1fI4ns/kikbtDKy+KElWeXQAyNXm4J3V0gzExRUcLVLL6/l5d AzmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jWEqtA+5EytBYVR/nvpY3pY9CIYKS7xIYZmx0htPTHY=; b=J+C34Nla5Myx5MgeJNF4ZXtT6MOH6849j6jJUf44qbPc7SuIaiZrfCVsE9U2A+Uj6o xTASXGHrQVwuFdXvkkVV+5baoBZ+GMgY4NEghyaCRiMUMUZJIN16V//GkmWqvN52Oiam XL1/NvUJeL6FRo7h3tjp0rLPIigBzFgeAm5zHyZGJE/QD6M5dFwSCGeV25ZggiCpmvVq Axx09tThle7AdNNN1LO4rdE6hqW5zFB/wszhYb2pREl9Is7YRsNfTF9FPoyQDsO/4e5B 1uthoj8u4oilB4306nQZyohNFbSX75GeG7y01e7NKpmGAroHyccU2sJLYxnBL+6gW33m XWYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPPHP4WLIOg7a01XR5I3uTkJmBrG+C1u6GJJjjkzGXuBqOTtPBiSf5TG3aGMVFDSnjtiCF12McuX173cQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.5.22 with SMTP id 22mr6743908ljf.64.1474064308058; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.217.93 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609161808300.92010@ary.lan>
References: <D60BBDEF-3C13-44CB-A0D9-DEA98F5297F5@gmail.com> <20160916181356.70566.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1kQRJVEBY=fP_NF6ViOBbNaPpwEbo5dXHkHkpWWECkQ5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLODkPtEmihsbKNPQcYwKCQtvkz9JrjDoU=UXUxKtJrLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iLG6MOSR2ugs7HrB=+3W9T9zOLvpxWuZN2fi2LmJ0WEKQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609161757100.92010@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1nVmbww+BtPw5cLT8Daz4MhRJkRw-JVL4dHzW6oPGSw5g@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1609161808300.92010@ary.lan>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 18:17:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1nvbK2x+9PJUWixr+Qt9SBoAtdg7G76EStL+nhkAqtiQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1148d1f0754cea053ca757b5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/IoMG-xxOpKZmmLM0G7ZtN6pZkgE>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] moving forward on special use names
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:18:32 -0000

Hm, possibly what you mean is that it's not mentioned explicitly enough.
I think the document covers the problem in quite a bit of detail, but the
private domains stuff is mostly in the history section; I could understand
if you felt that this provided insufficient clarity.

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 6:10 PM, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> Section 4.1.2 of the tldr document actually says almost exactly what you
>> said in your four-pronged strategy, but without the pejorative bit.
>>
>
> I just looked at it again, and don't see anything about the toxic waste
> names.  Since they're the ones that are hard, I really think we need to
> call them out.  Feel free to come up with a different metaphor if you don't
> like the one about a part of the DNS space that's too polluted to use.
>
> R's,
> John
>