IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt

"YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn> Mon, 09 November 2009 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A728D3A6A41 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:18:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <BPsATXkwT8kt>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.064
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.064 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.907, BAYES_40=-0.185, J_CHICKENPOX_53=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BPsATXkwT8kt for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cnnic.cn (smtp.cnnic.cn [159.226.7.146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63A723A69F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 16:18:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (eyou send program); Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:19:04 +0800
Message-ID: <457725944.11384@cnnic.cn>
X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: yaojk@cnnic.cn
Received: from unknown (HELO whatisfuture) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:19:04 +0800
Message-ID: <021201ca60d2$3d066b70$01125d85@whatisfuture>
From: YAO Jiankang <yaojk@cnnic.cn>
To: kim.davies@icann.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
References: <457585796.08137@cnnic.cn> <457599336.12542@cnnic.cn>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:19:00 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Cc: ajs@shinkuro.com, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:18:38 -0000

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "YAO Jiankang" <yaojk@cnnic.cn>; <kim.davies@icann.org>
Cc: <ajs@shinkuro.com>; <dnsop@ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-01.txt


> At 5:23 PM +0800 11/7/09, YAO Jiankang wrote:
>>it means that there will have a potential future delegation in the DNS root
>>zone if the technical problems involved is solved.
>>So IETF is a nice place to help to solve the technical problems.
> 
> True. But the draft in question does not appear to do that. It instead says "two solutions have been produced, both have known problems, so here is the 
> argument for one of them". Andrew argues for the other one.

actually,  there are 4 solutions in the draft(two category solutions). I will summarize it later.

> 
> --Paul Hoffman, Director
> --VPN Consortium
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.41.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status