Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D6C1289FA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:08:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0bDCOCew9dp for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 320E7126D00 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 08:08:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id o6so431007qtk.6 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 08:08:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=mj797F/2WOzc+wvkONjY0P3Ymcy9FHnk5WMkCyuyoIU=; b=Xru3t35IOsRvWfam5DcKZRxDqJYBXeN1ijspajJVZf1nti6wZWL1tebZxm9ILgrTGY rfOQvG14kMk29Y6WSW8yIcpQoflk6R1H5kmduSpY4gKSkeAn3jM4MtpJfojxF3yMKfl1 +FK+f/wlCHCmx4WVotlG0Bo86WeMLGSC7gNH1RZNwQuoiYV1Z9WceyG14Pfycr+XFcPn W3DtuF30XEkXh+yOk8hhtVRkh66Iy29laNgLLSr2aJOBtLKtUg7kNvF6YMTZOgglpyJx fPAyw2yNWIz/dwYQY5HscYH0C/nVrDuQUteLhH0dz61TB5H5ONzVzGbmL1E6sdnN0WJZ jISQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=mj797F/2WOzc+wvkONjY0P3Ymcy9FHnk5WMkCyuyoIU=; b=CE2h7GHZHiTtRhpcKWY/7AIXCGab+L5CWqvMw9IDaEqgkWIIT6cZZTebkCBeSs//p4 NcyE50yD/vY+GcStK7w5qz/HR3RWNpbCK++0Sfj8sI058NHpk/jk5C7aNEQG7p8WEq6b dF6qiGumevzicLEEKIXC25RCd4whRv87Dkz1PxASw4PTgiqHGZpeoo+ZRnxTIKPKnVkT d9hfIBAv1bBdtt81t1tZHRLzoEuh1fc9K023GKW0gPVYdYZYOH2gs48WXOApIFk0EezQ abY5DdYV8jOahdpfSyzQpnrbf3GjXZjSpLZu9pnNLvadKM9Io4NxW+aRzVwhy3WJj9gL OYnw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYC0m0gOFf5UpRQyFUWB46dSRGWBWwWiMg0HTqvk6E9luJSdC/E BWFJQHWtYj2iDVmkBZvZgOznZw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iabo0z0fbarjdGiAZAq/OUuXeFsqwwRrh5legQvnfu6+bqLPncIoF8NBYj8lTLZdZEKGKudcA==
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2ee5:: with SMTP id k92mr12657656qtd.304.1549555716210; Thu, 07 Feb 2019 08:08:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.34] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d50sm47000091qta.31.2019.02.07.08.08.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Feb 2019 08:08:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <5C8B5FF4-CF0A-4D6D-9621-4D8A4544F7BC@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A5BB2C82-8E6A-48DB-B2B1-D13AA6EF69C8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 11:08:27 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20190207160511.mua3wa244wr34rkt@hi.is>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
To: Marius Olafsson <marius@hi.is>
References: <fcd790a2-414b-491e-01e2-9aa92f7b1c4e@nic.cz> <CAAeHe+xySnrvpD4-nhi3T0qiEmz8h0ZNUE_2kie7ctq8YPGRPA@mail.gmail.com> <56839e19-afe9-df4b-d432-09a949cc658c@nic.cz> <06E02AB3-5E3B-4E1F-9B23-BB0810F73B66@fugue.com> <20190207160511.mua3wa244wr34rkt@hi.is>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JKIHHqiK8lrMUOyNAhvWH-aiCwI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] RFC 1035 vs. mandatory NS at apex?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:08:39 -0000

On Feb 7, 2019, at 11:05 AM, Marius Olafsson <marius@hi.is> wrote:
> "The authoritative servers for a zone are enumerated in the NS records
>   for the origin of the zone, which, along with a Start of Authority
>   (SOA) record are the mandatory records in every zone."

Problem solved.   :)