Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 06 March 2015 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951141A6F34 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:36:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhsR-1baH-Kg for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445021A6F2F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:b015:3cb0:25ba:df77] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cb:b015:3cb0:25ba:df77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F1EF1851C; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 19:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <54FA0197.9040301@redbarn.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:35:51 -0800
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20150306145217.GA8959@nic.fr> <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com> <54F9F90D.1020806@redbarn.org> <D11F67C1.982D%edward.lewis@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <D11F67C1.982D%edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050500030009030300020009"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JZuBVkhsAzdc1MkA5tUFCRyYq7w>
Cc: "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 19:36:00 -0000


Edward Lewis wrote:
> On 3/6/15, 13:59, "Paul Vixie" <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
>> >there's a much bigger problem with ANY, which is, its only valid use is
>> >for diagnostics.
>
> And it's not even necessary for that.  One can easily enumerate through
> all interesting types.

so, i disagree, but it doesn't matter.

i disagree, because the existence of a non-predicted type can have
extreme significance.

it doesn't matter, because this is a meta-query example, and all
meta-queries should remain available under ACL (see my other message on
this thread about RD=0 to recursive-only servers, and zone transfer
query types.)

-- 
Paul Vixie