Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 07 January 2021 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C0F3A1188 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rAqKsICwkiLZ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 06:22:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCE9F3A1184 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 06:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id h22so15000975lfu.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 06:22:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EaQnH+9HHzZ5TxekjT/kLxqOXYxEiPlud0qZ1Fx+1aE=; b=TWkP2T9W/8hkriFscu0srd19xf7i4waZ3XeJZbs5UTgGC092L5bw+YJyvy+OdkMrxN eDXEkT//5uD5FlULn4NyByBUJ/VKzgO9RS47pAl2HKMIlW3EpmENdHIYu5LN855RS9zF wIsOSBAwfYgv0tSY8lKIL6yAgzMMiO8zCpYNGZOhmlo1HWWEvMrNB1S5PcGWQT049GxA K+wX7/frTlxqJTnAuKw+MbooIkP1mNozIXFEcUBrF6JTB1+0eQPWYuonauzOByZ9GWYs JQRleJk8NTmYY8tcrsysVOQDwsqkFARRMCnll4HO02fL7De564T/yXytj5OxvibkXyk+ dzkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EaQnH+9HHzZ5TxekjT/kLxqOXYxEiPlud0qZ1Fx+1aE=; b=laCWhz71lTzhdLh59U1acDeA/WzmRg8vDV4mOn+reX+PDh3VaiEB4KmTNN/vtJCy9D rp9y/aZY1b/9M4rWSCPRKCMGFs0pqkhE6RIMOXKZBIXGve4+5NwonzyxueiZ25V86B7x qsbMF4JSsvzq1AslQFlAAL3Hjt7gLbrptpZjwHLQPOnoE6QOgcLG8D5a84skMQIVX2Mx 9Nxuab4j0UhUqTX4+itDXQ1gyBDqgQ56BSZUNvFub7ovxADKr4tZy85jb1eC8VJ/U6H7 rxlFMYF0owkx1eSVqH/lZD+hdPQyZKNl4/nTq1UFHGrPVyfS2agJ20cHoBfzviVCGuPe 0J9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531s6pzQ0Azo0K3Oyw5yq42CqnF0JdZKJAWNYpwbMEZFDMlAW4Ke WFMHWyMkgI4fGef9kQ1lsuBW5C7O/FzuhnCbbfm93A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzeiXzn65kYbQiodxwfR7H7m5o08g4OCXfdEH7ARTSTwdfqtIX6sf7L+mCyiDKGDWlvwkEoJdedSfG455hX2Vo=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:5216:: with SMTP id m22mr3987201lfb.459.1610029363310; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 06:22:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1EC6E61D-BD80-43EB-9A86-13191889AE20@tapril.net> <E0AB68A6-83B9-4ACB-AD6A-24A8A435E039@tapril.net> <CAHbrMsD828qEku7_ni1v5vF5Qgf0EnAZu3KjSXrZh-8UHoYayg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHbrMsD828qEku7_ni1v5vF5Qgf0EnAZu3KjSXrZh-8UHoYayg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:22:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iL+rir_-CD8JfZPiiwgx2JEfVX19wUYiBTs1xpqbQrgmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Schwartz <bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Tim April <ietf=40tapril.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JbVGzhFjuiyaEvyptA1AzIe8cOQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:22:48 -0000

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 9:34 PM Ben Schwartz
<bemasc=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I support the deployment of ZONEMD in the root zone.  This is a valuable protection today and a prerequisite for many of the proposals in DPRIVE.

Unsurprisingly, me too.

The root is the poster child for ZONEMD...

W

>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Tim April <ietf=40tapril.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello DNSOP,
>>
>> Forwarding along to DNSOP as well. If you have any comments or feedback on the two proposed RZERC documents, please let me know by January 15th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --tim
>>
>> Forwarded message:
>>
>> From: Tim April ietf@tapril.net
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Cc: iab@iab.org
>> Subject: RZERC Draft Documents For Review
>> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 15:49:06 -0500
>>
>> Hello IETF,
>>
>> I wanted to provide a quick update on the work going on in the RZERC. We have been discussing and iterating on the two documents attached and we have reached the point where we would like to gather feedback from the various constituencies represented in the RZERC. As your local member, I will be collecting any feedback on the documents ahead of our next meeting on the 19th of January. If possible, please provide any feedback here or directly to me the 15th of January.
>>
>> Document 1: Recommendations Regarding Signing Root Zone Name Server Data - This document outlines the benefits and potential concerns related to signing the root-servers.net zone. It recommends that the ICANN org conduct studies into the impact that signing the root-servers.net zone might have.
>>
>> Document 2: Adding Zone Data Protections to the Root Zone - This document discusses recommends that the Root Server Operators, Public Technical Identifiers and the Root Zone Maintainer do the necessary work to create a plan for deploying ZONEMD, ensuring that it would not negatively impact the distribution of the zone data to the Root Server System. It also recommends that the DNS and Internet community be notified of the changes all under the assumption that draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-zone-digest becomes an RFC.
>>
>> Again, if you have any comments or feedback on the documents, please provide them be January 15th.
>>
>> --tim
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DNSOP mailing list
>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop



-- 
The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
complexities of his own making.
  -- E. W. Dijkstra