Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 11 May 2017 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BEE129C59 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=MAgSMNu2; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Rs7mob3H
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynqOI05kNrHV for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF30712E04F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 10:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 43184 invoked from network); 11 May 2017 17:33:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=a8ae.5914a074.k1705; bh=7P/9bZb7k8mq/DvyAz4qURTYObGBVr61ppzMOndG7hg=; b=MAgSMNu24N3tPR7U3WJMmlGrv8WbleuvrHDRoWpAKJXeVnN2VFFxjsvhJGPxVcjaRdqquDmlobFiaEscIEKdmA0awvpbnNhzPIW06IU2TZz1iJMD2nEcob0U3n7kTjXIBpqSpebzKZNgNByxcsXcBN8X3vilBNVm1flIQa62d0mVMrnVQkxZMejc1Od9wuo+hMHU3fYD7e4sdMiATqEX03CdR7NMIcortKcmNKKGQWiJUGu+SzoZ4vJ0X5CJQ+tm
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=a8ae.5914a074.k1705; bh=7P/9bZb7k8mq/DvyAz4qURTYObGBVr61ppzMOndG7hg=; b=Rs7mob3HUT8mFNYwahZaKUjxo4xsjV+PfIhF+ienJTrOf2vN0J5FaW9ySttagIm8XW8YEsskHhEkRR3wlsrZgRLC8EgYL1aKh/LVgR2vL/gR5rrbO7PP4MYDDo0uoAj6/xuKkOG4xSvCP7WZsD1Ew/aTmMSQ+pNudzSdiby82xA9V4W8ZhyfsjkfQIeTpIvr9ULdL6hQiKuzHlDvm0qWiBDE0WNRPBRSsz/seN2f6zLCg5L1Nb6VC2o07aqG9YLT
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 11 May 2017 17:33:40 -0000
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 13:33:40 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1705111329370.38256@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <59149F29.6090908@redbarn.org>
References: <20170511165852.34338.qmail@ary.lan> <59149F29.6090908@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/JdgzlQxXRVj3MZsVmzQLxkq2f10>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-isp-ip6rdns-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 17:38:37 -0000

>> What would be the operational advantage of accepting mail from IPv6 hosts
>> too lame to set up rDNS?
>
> we will never know, because every v6 end system will have a ptr, either 
> naturally, or machine-generated for it, because v6 providers will not 
> want their rank-and-file v6 endsystems to be excluded from important 
> activities such as transmitting e-mail.

You might want to talk to large providers that do v6 now.  With only one 
exception I can think of, they have no plans to do synthesized v6 rDNS, 
and they routinely block port 25 from all their consumer networks.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly